Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23481068›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2013

Comparative analysis of the genomes of Shigella dysenteriae type 2 & type 7 isolates.

Partha Pal, Arunima Pal, Swapan Kumar Niyogi, T Ramamurthy, Rupak K Bhadra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Remediation of intramacrophagealThe Indian journal of medical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Partha PalCSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
Arunima Pal
Swapan Kumar Niyogi
T Ramamurthy
Rupak K Bhadra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesThe four species of the genus Shigella, namely, S. dysenteriae , S. flexneri, S. boydii and S. sonnei cause a wide spectrum of illness from watery diarrhoea to severe dysentery. Genomes of these four species show great diversity. In this study, NotI, XbaI or I-CeuI restriction enzyme digested genomes of two Shigella dysenteriae isolates belonging to the serotypes 2 and 7 were extensively analyzed to find their relatedness, if any, with the whole genome sequenced strains of S. dysenteriae type 1 and S. flexneri type 2a.

methodsPulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) technique was used to determine the diversity of Shigella genomes by rapid construction of physical maps. DNA end labelling, Southern hybridization and PCR techniques were also applied for mapping purposes.

resultsThe intron-coded enzyme I-CeuI cuts the bacterial genome specifically at its rrn operon. PFGE of I-CeuI digested S. dysenteriae genomes were found to carry seven rrn operons. However, I-CeuI profiles showed distinct restriction fragment polymorphism (RFLP) between the isolates as well as with the whole genome sequenced isolates. Further studies revealed that the genome sizes and I-CeuI linkage maps of the S. dysenteriae type 7 and type 2 isolates were similar to that of S. dysenteriae type 1 and S. flexneri type 2a genomes, respectively. INTERPRETATION &

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the type 7 and type 1 isolates of S. dysenteriae were probably evolved from a same precursor, while the type 2 and S. flexneri type 2a were probably evolved and diversified from a common progenitor.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialDNA Restriction EnzymesDysentery, BacillaryElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansPhylogenyRestriction MappingShigellaDNA Restriction Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID23481068
PMCPMC3657883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.