Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23480440›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences

Biomarkers of sepsis.

James D Faix

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 336 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
336citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03841162 completednot on this map

Fast Assay for Pathogen Identification and Characterization - Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHasselt UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled1,957ConditionsBacteremia, Sepsis, Septic Shock
NCT04163705 unknown statusnot on this map

Immune Profile of Patients With Positive Blood Cultures and Multiple Organ Dysfunctions

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital El CruceRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsSepsis, SevereArmsblood sample collection
NCT06006325 naunknown statusnot on this map

Electroacupuncture Modulates the Metabolism of SPMs and Ameliorates Respiratory Symptoms and Inflammation in Patients With Sepsis Complicating ARDS

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Nankai HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsSepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmselectroacupuncture treatment, sham electroacupuncture treatment
NCT06586372 not yet recruitingnot on this map

CRP,CRP/Alb Ratio, N/L Ratio in Predictors of Both Systemic Infection and Survival in Patient With Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsSepsis, Systemic Infection
NCT07033910 completednot on this map

The Effect of Extracorporeal Sepsis Adsorption Column Use on Plasma Syndecan-1 Level and Mortality in Sepsis Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorOral MENTEŞRan2023 to 2024Enrolled91ConditionsSepsis, Syndecan 1, Extracorporeal Sepsis Adsorption ColumnArmssepsis adsorption column
NCT07760415 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Electroencephalogram Changes and Cognitive Function Profiles in Sepsis Patients With Different Inflammatory Phenotypes

TypeobservationalSponsorXiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled78ConditionsSepsis, Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy, Sepsis and Septic Shock, Sepsis at Intensive Care UnitArmsEEG monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

336 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 649 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review

276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James D FaixDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. jim.faix@stanford.edu
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is an unusual systemic reaction to what is sometimes an otherwise ordinary infection, and it probably represents a pattern of response by the immune system to injury. A hyper-inflammatory response is followed by an immunosuppressive phase during which multiple organ dysfunction is present and the patient is susceptible to nosocomial infection. Biomarkers to diagnose sepsis may allow early intervention which, although primarily supportive, can reduce the risk of death. Although lactate is currently the most commonly used biomarker to identify sepsis, other biomarkers may help to enhance lactate's effectiveness; these include markers of the hyper-inflammatory phase of sepsis, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines; proteins such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin which are synthesized in response to infection and inflammation; and markers of neutrophil and monocyte activation. Recently, markers of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis, such as anti-inflammatory cytokines, and alterations of the cell surface markers of monocytes and lymphocytes have been examined. Combinations of pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers in a multi-marker panel may help identify patients who are developing severe sepsis before organ dysfunction has advanced too far. Combined with innovative approaches to treatment that target the immunosuppressive phase, these biomarkers may help to reduce the mortality rate associated with severe sepsis which, despite advances in supportive measures, remains high.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCytokinesHumansImmunosuppression TherapyInflammationNeutrophil ActivationSepsisBiomarkersCytokines

Identifiers

PMID23480440
PMCPMC3613962
OpenAlexW1973468590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.