Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23480318›Full record

ArticleInternational endodontic journal2013

Evaluation of a nonthermal plasma needle to eliminate ex vivo biofilms in root canals of extracted human teeth.

C Schaudinn, D Jaramillo, M O Freire, P P Sedghizadeh, A Nguyen, P Webster, J W Costerton, C Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International endodontic journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AnBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Medically important biofilms and non-thermal plasma.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C SchaudinnRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany; House Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
D Jaramillo
M O Freire
P P Sedghizadeh
A Nguyen
P Webster
J W Costerton
C Jiang
House Clinic · USUniversity of Southern California · USAllegheny-Singer Research Institute · USLoma Linda University · USRobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
Nanosecond pulsed plasma technology for endodontic biofilm disinfectionR21DE020167 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JIANG, CHUNQI, WEBSTER, PAUL · 2010 to 2011
$399k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE020167NIDCR NIH HHS R21-DE020167-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy of a nonthermal plasma (NTP) at atmospheric pressure on ex vivo biofilm in root canals of extracted teeth. METHODOLOGY: Intracanal contents from three teeth with root canal infections were collected, pooled and grown in thirty-five microCT-mapped root canals of extracted and instrumented human teeth. One group of teeth was treated with NTP, another with 6% NaOCl and one set was left untreated. The intracanal contents from twenty-seven teeth (nine teeth in each group) were plated on agar and colony forming units were determined. Parametric test of one-way analysis of variance (anova) was used to analyse statistical significance. The remaining teeth were cut open, stained with LIVE/DEAD(®) and examined with confocal laser scanning microscopy.

resultsThe untreated root canals were covered with biofilm of varying thickness. Treatment with nonthermal plasma decreased the number of viable bacteria in biofilms by one order of magnitude, whilst the NaOCl control achieved a reduction of more than four magnitudes. Both the NTP and the NaOCl treatment results were significantly different from the negative control (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe nonthermal plasma displayed antimicrobial activity against endodontic biofilms in root canals, but was not as effective as the use of 6% NaOCl.

Indexed as

BiofilmsNeedlesPlasma GasesColony Count, MicrobialDental Pulp CavityEndodonticsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPlasma GasesbiofilmEndodonticsmicro-CTnonthermal plasma

Identifiers

PMID23480318
PMCPMC3687033
OpenAlexW2092653386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.