Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23479323›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2013

Impact of a multiple mice holder on quantitation of high-throughput MicroPET imaging with and without Ct attenuation correction.

Frezghi Habte, Gang Ren, Timothy C Doyle, Hongguang Liu, Zhen Cheng, David S Paik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors UsingMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-Throughput PET/CT Imaging Using a Multiple-Mouse Imaging System.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High-throughput multiple-mouse imaging with micro-PET/CT for whole-skeleton assessment.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2014
    Article
  14. Simultaneous ECG-gated PET imaging of multiple mice.Nuclear medicine and biology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frezghi HabteMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford, CA, USA, fhabte@stanford.edu.
Gang Ren
Timothy C Doyle
Hongguang Liu
Zhen Cheng
David S Paik
Stanford Medicine · US

Funding

Stanford Nanocharacterization LaboratoryU54CA119367 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2006 to 2010
$19.8M
Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
Pilot ProjectsU54CA151459 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2010 to 2014
$12.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119367NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of scanning multiple mice simultaneously on image quantitation, relative to single mouse scans on both a micro-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (microPET/CT) scanner (which utilizes CT-based attenuation correction to the PET reconstruction) and a dedicated microPET scanner using an inexpensive mouse holder "hotel."

methodsWe developed a simple mouse holder made from common laboratory items that allows scanning multiple mice simultaneously. It is also compatible with different imaging modalities to allow multiple mice and multi-modality imaging. For this study, we used a radiotracer ((64)Cu-GB170) with a relatively long half-life (12.7 h), selected to allow scanning at times after tracer uptake reaches steady state. This also reduces the effect of decay between sequential imaging studies, although the standard decay corrections were performed. The imaging was also performed using a common tracer, 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), although the faster decay and faster pharmacokinetics of FDG may introduce greater biological variations due to differences in injection-to-scan timing. We first scanned cylindrical mouse phantoms (50 ml tubes) both in a groups of four at a time (multiple mice mode) and then individually (single mouse mode), using microPET/CT and microPET scanners to validate the process. Then, we imaged a first set of four mice with subcutaneous tumors (C2C12Ras) in both single- and multiple-mice imaging modes. Later, a second set of four normal mice were injected with FDG and scanned 1 h post-injection. Immediately after completion of the scans, ex vivo biodistribution studies were performed on all animals to provide a "gold-standard" to compare quantitative values obtained from PET. A semi-automatic threshold-based region of interest tool was used to minimize operator variability during image analysis.

resultsPhantom studies showed less than 4.5 % relative error difference between the single- and multiple-mice imaging modes of PET imaging with CT-based attenuation correction and 18.4 % without CT-based attenuation correction. In vivo animal studies (n = 4) showed <5 % (for (64)Cu, p > 0.686) and <15 % (for FDG, p > 0.4 except for brain image data p = 0.029) relative mean difference with respect to percent injected dose per gram (%ID/gram) between the single- and multiple-mice microPET imaging mode when CT-based attenuation correction is performed. Without CT-based attenuation correction, we observed relative mean differences of about 11 % for (64)Cu and 15 % for FDG.

conclusionOur results confirmed the potential use of a microPET/CT scanner for multiple mice simultaneous imaging without significant sacrifice in quantitative accuracy as well as in image quality. Thus, the use of the mouse "hotel" is an aid to increasing instrument throughput on small animal scanners with minimal loss of quantitative accuracy.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsCalibrationFemaleImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMice, NudePositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID23479323
PMCPMC5247256
OpenAlexW2050209952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.