ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2013
An implementation of hydrophobic force in implicit solvent molecular dynamics simulation for packed proteins.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing major metabolites of lamiaceae family as potential inhibitors ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- A Computational and Chemical Design Strategy for Manipulating Glycan-Protein Recognition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Trypsin-Ligand binding affinities calculated using an effective interaction entropy method under polarized force field.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of polarization on HIV-1protease and fluoro-substituted inhibitors binding energies by large scale molecular dynamics simulations.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Molecular simulation study of PAMAM dendrimer composite membranes.Journal of molecular modeling · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MD simulations of five proteins in which helical chains are held together by hydrophobic packing were carried out to investigate the effect of hydrophobic force on simulated structures of these protein complexes in implicit generalized Born (GB) model. The simulation study employed three different methods to treat hydrophobic effect: the standard GB method that does not include explicit hydrophobic force, the LCPO method that includes explicit hydrophobic force based directly on solvent accessible surface area (SASA), and a proposed packing enforced GB (PEGB) method that includes explicit hydrophobic force based on the radius of gyration of the protein complex. Our simulation study showed that all five protein complexes were unpacked in the standard GB simulation (without explicit hydrophobic force). In the LCPO method, three of the five protein systems remained well packed during the simulation, indicating the need for an explicit hydrophobic force in GB model for these packed protein systems. However, two of the five systems were still unpacked during LCPO simulation. For comparison, all five protein systems remain well packed in simulation using the new PEGB method. Analysis shows that the failure of the LCPO method in two cases is related to the way that SASA changes during the unpacking process for these two systems. These examples showed that standard GB method without explicit hydrophobic force is not suitable for MD simulation of protein systems involving hydrophobic packing. A similar problem remains but to a much lesser extent in the LCPO method for some packed protein systems. The proposed PEGB method seems quite promising for MD simulation of large, multi-domain packed proteins in implicit solvent model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23479281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.