Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23479138›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2013

Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease.

E Ray Dorsey, Vinayak Venkataraman, Matthew J Grana, Michael T Bull, Benjamin P George, Cynthia M Boyd, Christopher A Beck, Balaraman Rajan, Abraham Seidmann, Kevin M Biglan

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 102 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01476306 nacompletednot on this map

Providing Specialty Care to Individuals With Parkinsonism Directly in Their Homes Via Web-based Video Conferencing- A Comparative Effectiveness Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled20ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsTelemedicine, Usual care
NCT02038959 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Using Technology to Deliver Multi-disciplinary Care to Individuals With Parkinson Disease in Their Homes: the Connect.Parkinson Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RochesterRan2014 to 2016Enrolled210ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsVirtual Visits
NCT02144220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Remote Access to Care, Everywhere: Using Telemedicine to Deliver Patient-centered Care to Patients With Parkinson Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RochesterRan2014 to 2016Enrolled277ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsVirtual care visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Tele-neuropsychological assessment tools in Italy: a systematic review on psychometric properties and usability.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Interrater reliability between in-person and telemedicine evaluations in obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Televisits for Parkinson's disease: benefits and barriers.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Digital Inclusion in Parkinson's Disease: A Case-Control Study.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E Ray DorseyDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. ray.dorsey@jhmi.edu
Vinayak Venkataraman
Matthew J Grana
Michael T Bull
Benjamin P George
Cynthia M Boyd
Christopher A Beck
Balaraman Rajan
Abraham Seidmann
Kevin M Biglan
University of Rochester · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Treatment Burden in Older Adults with Diabetes and MultimorbidityK23AG032910 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2009 to 2013
$533k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG 032910NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe burden of neurological disorders is increasing, but access to care is limited. Providing specialty care to patients via telemedicine could help alleviate this growing problem.

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and economic benefits of using web-based videoconferencing (telemedicine) to provide specialty care to patients with Parkinson disease in their homes.

designA 7-month, 2-center, randomized controlled clinical trial.

settingPatients' homes and outpatient clinics at 2 academic medical centers.

participantsTwenty patients with Parkinson disease with Internet access at home.

interventionCare from a specialist delivered remotely at home or in person in the clinic.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome variable was feasibility, as measured by the percentage of telemedicine visits completed as scheduled. Secondary outcome measures included clinical benefit, as measured by the 39-item Parkinson Disease Questionnaire, and economic value, as measured by time and travel.

resultsTwenty participants enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to telemedicine (n = 9) or in-person care (n = 11). Of the 27 scheduled telemedicine visits, 25 (93%) were completed, and of the 33 scheduled in-person visits, 30 (91%) were completed (P = .99). In this small study, the change in quality of life did not differ for those randomly assigned to telemedicine compared with those randomly assigned to in-person care (4.0-point improvement vs 6.4-point improvement; P = .61). Compared with in-person visits, each telemedicine visit saved participants, on average, 100 miles of travel and 3 hours of time. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Using web-based videoconferencing to provide specialty care at home is feasible, provides value to patients, and may offer similar clinical benefit to that of in-person care. Larger studies are needed to determine whether the clinical benefits are indeed comparable to those of in-person care and whether the results observed are generalizable.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01476306.

Indexed as

AgedFeasibility StudiesHouse CallsHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseasePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID23479138
PMCPMC3791511
OpenAlexW2022635697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.