Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23478996›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2013

Loop C and the mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-channel gating.

Prasad Purohit, Anthony Auerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Ion Channels in Anesthesia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cyclic activation of endplate acetylcholine receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Prasad PurohitDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Anthony Auerbach

Funding

MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR37NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2000 to 2013
$6.9M
Engineering a Transmitter Binding SiteR01NS064969 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Multiple Activity Patterns of Acetylcholine ReceptorsR56NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2014 to 2014
$530k
MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR01NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 1987 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS-064969NINDS NIH HHS NS-23513NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064969NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS023513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agonist molecules at the two neuromuscular acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (AChR) transmitter-binding sites increase the probability of channel opening. In one hypothesis for AChR activation ("priming"), the capping of loop C at each binding site transfers energy independently to the distant gate over a discrete structural pathway. We used single-channel analyses to examine the experimental support for this proposal with regard to brief unliganded openings, the effects of loop-C modifications, the effects of mutations to residues either on or off the putative pathway, and state models for describing currents at low [ACh]. The results show that (a) diliganded and brief unliganded openings are generated by the same essential, global transition; (b) the radical manipulation of loop C does not prevent channel opening but impairs agonist binding; (c) both on- and off-pathway mutations alter gating by changing the relative stability of the open-channel conformation by local interactions rather than by perturbing a specific site-gate communication link; and (d) it is possible to estimate directly the rate constants for agonist dissociation from and association to both the low and high affinity forms of the AChR-binding site by using a cyclic kinetic model. We conclude that the mechanism of energy transfer between the binding sites and the gate remains an open question.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAllosteric SiteAmino Acid SequenceHEK293 CellsHumansKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Sequence DataMutation, MissenseNicotinic AgonistsProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, NicotinicNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID23478996
PMCPMC3607824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.