ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2013
Components of gating charge movement and S4 voltage-sensor exposure during activation of hERG channels.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Determinants of Voltage-Dependent Gating in Kv11.1 Channels.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- The voltage-sensing domain of a hERG1 mutant is a cation-selective channel.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Hysteretic hERG channel gating current recorded at physiological temperature.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The EAG Voltage-Dependent KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Modulation of hERG KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Main-chain mutagenesis reveals intrahelical coupling in an ion channel voltage-sensor.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Functional characterization of Kv11.1 (hERG) potassium channels split in the voltage-sensing domain.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018Article
- Gating mechanism of Kv11.1 (hERG) KPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018Article
- The Fast Component of hERG Gating Charge: An Interaction between D411 in the S1 and S4 Residues.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Sequence of gating charge movement and pore gating in HERG activation and deactivation pathways.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- NS1643 interacts around L529 of hERG to alter voltage sensor movement on the path to activation.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Cellular mechanisms of mutations in Kv7.1: auditory functions in Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome vs. Romano-Ward syndrome.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Functional significance of K+ channel β-subunit KCNE3 in auditory neurons.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Proline scan of the HERG channel S6 helix reveals the location of the intracellular pore gate.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Gating charge movement precedes ionic current activation in hERG channels.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2014Article
- The electric heart of hERG.The Journal of general physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The human ether-á-go-go-related gene (hERG) K(+) channel encodes the pore-forming α subunit of the rapid delayed rectifier current, IKr, and has unique activation gating kinetics, in that the α subunit of the channel activates and deactivates very slowly, which focuses the role of IKr current to a critical period during action potential repolarization in the heart. Despite its physiological importance, fundamental mechanistic properties of hERG channel activation gating remain unclear, including how voltage-sensor movement rate limits pore opening. Here, we study this directly by recording voltage-sensor domain currents in mammalian cells for the first time and measuring the rates of voltage-sensor modification by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate chloride (MTSET). Gating currents recorded from hERG channels expressed in mammalian tsA201 cells using low resistance pipettes show two charge systems, defined as Q(1) and Q(2), with V(1/2)'s of -55.7 (equivalent charge, z = 1.60) and -54.2 mV (z = 1.30), respectively, with the Q(2) charge system carrying approximately two thirds of the overall gating charge. The time constants for charge movement at 0 mV were 2.5 and 36.2 ms for Q(1) and Q(2), decreasing to 4.3 ms for Q(2) at +60 mV, an order of magnitude faster than the time constants of ionic current appearance at these potentials. The voltage and time dependence of Q2 movement closely correlated with the rate of MTSET modification of I521C in the outermost region of the S4 segment, which had a V(1/2) of -64 mV and time constants of 36 ± 8.5 ms and 11.6 ± 6.3 ms at 0 and +60 mV, respectively. Modeling of Q(1) and Q(2) charge systems showed that a minimal scheme of three transitions is sufficient to account for the experimental findings. These data point to activation steps further downstream of voltage-sensor movement that provide the major delays to pore opening in hERG channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.