ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013
Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.The Milbank quarterly · 2015Pooled it
- Factors Associated With the Overuse of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityPooled it
- Effect of alverine citrate plus simethicone in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Environmentally friendly pediatric gastroenterology: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns of Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the US, 1997-2019.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Sustainable development goals: a call for future internal medicine.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- The Impact and Interactions of Race and Gender on Healthcare Use and Spending in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Low-Value Care Among Older Adults in a Large Statewide Health System.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Adherence to Follow-Up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Test in Patients Aged 45-49 Years: Real-World Differences Between Multitarget Stool DNA Testing and Fecal Immunochemical or Fecal Occult Blood Testing.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- The United European Gastroenterology green paper-climate change and gastroenterology.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Review
- Red-flag signs and symptoms for earlier diagnosis of early-onset colorectal cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Impacts of COVID-19 on Appropriate Use of Screening Colonoscopy in a Large Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a new ICD-10-based screening colonoscopy overuse measure in a large integrated healthcare system: a retrospective observational study.BMJ quality & safety · 2023Observational
- Inappropriate Multi-Target Stool DNA Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Risks, Compliance, and Outcomes.Cureus · 2023Article
- Characteristics Associated with Low-Value Cancer Screening Among Office-Based Physician Visits by Older Adults in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Observational
- Risk for Post-Colonoscopy Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Patients With and Without Antibiotic Exposure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceInappropriate use of colonoscopy involves unnecessary risk for older patients and consumes resources that could be used more effectively.
objectivesTo determine the frequency of potentially inappropriate colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries in Texas and to examine variation among physicians and across geographic regions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare claims data for Texas and a 5% sample from the United States from 2000 through 2009. We identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 years or older who underwent a colonoscopy from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009.
main outcome measuresColonoscopies were classified as screening in the absence of a diagnosis suggesting an indication for the procedure. Screening colonoscopy was considered potentially inappropriate on the basis of patient age or occurrence too soon after colonoscopy with negative findings. The percentage of patients undergoing potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy was estimated for each colonoscopist and hospital service area.
resultsA large percentage of colonoscopies performed in older adults were potentially inappropriate: 23.4% for the overall Texas cohort and 9.9%, 38.8%, and 24.9%, respectively, in patients aged 70 to 75, 76 to 85, or 86 years or older. There was considerable variation across the 797 colonoscopists in the percentages of colonoscopies performed that were potentially inappropriate. In a multilevel model including patient sex, race or ethnicity, number of comorbid conditions, educational level, and urban or rural residence, 73 colonoscopists had percentages significantly above the mean (23.9%), ranging from 28.7% to 45.5%, and 119 had percentages significantly below the mean (23.9%), ranging from 6.7% to 18.6%. The colonoscopists with percentages significantly above the mean were more likely to be surgeons, graduates of US medical schools, medical school graduates before 1990, and higher-volume colonoscopists than those with percentages significantly below the mean. Colonoscopist rankings were fairly stable over time (2006-2007 vs 2008-2009). There was also geographic variation across Texas and the United States, with percentages ranging from 13.3% to 34.9% in Texas and from 19.5% to 30.5% across the United States. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many colonoscopies performed in older adults may be inappropriate. The likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate colonoscopy depends in part on where patients live and what physician they see.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.