Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23478958›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Comparative analysis of the antibacterial activity of a novel peptide deformylase inhibitor, GSK1322322.

Karen O'Dwyer, Meredith Hackel, Sarah Hightower, Daryl Hoban, Samuel Bouchillon, Donghui Qin, Kelly Aubart, Magdalena Zalacain, Deborah Butler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  5. Acylhydrazones and Their Biological Activity: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century.Perspectives in medicinal chemistry · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen O'DwyerAntibacterial Discovery Performance Unit, Infectious Disease Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Meredith Hackel
Sarah Hightower
Daryl Hoban
Samuel Bouchillon
Donghui Qin
Kelly Aubart
Magdalena Zalacain
Deborah Butler
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GSK1322322 is a novel peptide deformylase (PDF) inhibitor being developed for the intravenous and oral treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The activity of GSK1322322 was tested against a global collection of clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae (n = 2,370), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 115), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 947), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 617), and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 940), including strains resistant to one or more marketed antibiotics. GSK1322322 had an MIC(90) of 1 μg/ml against M. catarrhalis and 4 μg/ml against H. influenzae, with 88.8% of β-lactamase-positive strains showing growth inhibition at that concentration. All S. pneumoniae strains were inhibited by ≤ 4 μg/ml of GSK1322322, with an MIC(90) of 2 μg/ml. Pre-existing resistance mechanisms did not affect its potency, as evidenced by the MIC(90) of 1 μg/ml for penicillin, levofloxacin, and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. GSK1322322 was very potent against S. pyogenes strains, with an MIC(90) of 0.5 μg/ml, irrespective of their macrolide resistance phenotype. This PDF inhibitor was also active against S. aureus strains regardless of their susceptibility to methicillin, macrolides, or levofloxacin, with an MIC(90) of 4 μg/ml in all cases. Time-kill studies showed that GSK1322322 had bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. pyogenes, and S. aureus, demonstrating a ≥ 3-log(10) decrease in the number of CFU/ml at 4× MIC within 24 h in 29 of the 33 strains tested. Given the antibacterial potency demonstrated against this panel of organisms, GSK1322322 represents a valuable alternative therapy for the treatment of infectious diseases caused by drug-resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

AmidohydrolasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicClinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnzyme InhibitorsHaemophilus influenzaeHydroxamic AcidsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoraxella catarrhalisStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeStreptococcus pyogenesAmidohydrolasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicEnzyme InhibitorsGSK1322322Hydroxamic Acidspeptide deformylase

Identifiers

PMID23478958
PMCPMC3632952
OpenAlexW2064667003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.