Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23478883›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013

Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange".

Alexia M Torke, Peter H Schwartz, Laura R Holtz, Kianna Montz, Greg A Sachs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexia M TorkeIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. atorke@iupui.edu
Peter H Schwartz
Laura R Holtz
Kianna Montz
Greg A Sachs

Funding

TRANSLATION RESEARCH ON CHRONIC DISEASE SELF-MANAGEMENTP30AG024967 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$3.2M
Patient-Oriented Research to Improve Geriatric Care-K24K24AG024078 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$1.4M
Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Older AdultsK23AG031323 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2009 to 2013
$772k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG031323NIA NIH HHS K23AG031323NIA NIH HHS K24 AG024078NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024967NIA NIH HHS P30AG024967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAlthough there is a growing recognition that older adults and those with extensive comorbid conditions undergo cancer screening too frequently, there is little information about patients' perceptions regarding cessation of cancer screening. Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening.

objectiveTo obtain a deeper understanding of older adults' perspectives on screening cessation and their experiences communicating with clinicians about this topic.

designSemistructured interview study.

settingSenior health center affiliated with an urban hospital.

participantsWe interviewed 33 older adults presenting to a senior health center. Their median age was 76 years (range, 63-91 years). Of the 33 participants, 27 were women; 15 were African American, 16 were white, 1 was Asian, and 1 was American Indian.

main outcome measuresWe transcribed audio recordings of interviews and analyzed them using methods of grounded theory to identify themes and illustrative quotes.

resultsUndergoing screening tests was perceived by participants as morally obligatory. Although many saw continued screening as a habit or custom not involving any decision, cessation of screening would require a major decision. Many asserted that they had never discussed screening cessation with their physicians or considered stopping on their own; some reported being upset when their physician recommended stopping. Although some would accept a physician's strong recommendation to stop, others thought that such a physician's recommendation would threaten trust or lead them to get another opinion. Participants were skeptical about the role of statistics and the recommendations of government panels in screening decisions but were more favorable toward stopping because of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or test burdens. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For many older adults, stopping screening is a major decision, but continuing screening is not. A physician's recommendation to stop may threaten patient trust. Effective strategies to reduce nonbeneficial screening may include discussion of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or burdens.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAttitudeAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID23478883
PMCPMC3748399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.