ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2013
Trends in colorectal incidence by anatomic subsite from 1985 to 2005: a population-based study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of methods to estimate colorectal cancer incidence using population-based cancer registries.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Statistical methods for measuring trends in colorectal cancer incidence in registries: A systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Associations between circulating 1,25(OH)₂D concentration and odds of metachronous colorectal adenoma.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2014Trial
- Detection of serrated lesions in proximal colon by simulated sigmoidoscopy vs faecal immunochemical testing in a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancy: Natural History, Management, and Outcomes.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Observational
- Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Article
- Incidence trends and age distribution of colorectal cancer by subsite in Guangzhou, 2000-2011.Chinese journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Spatial modeling of colonic lesions with geographic information systems.Iranian Red Crescent medical journal · 2015Article
- Long-fragment DNA as a potential marker for stool-based detection of colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Microangiopathy is common in submucosal vessels of the colon in patients with diabetes mellitus.The review of diabetic studies : RDS · 2014Article
- Simulated performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening for advanced neoplasia detection in a Greek population.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
- RAS Mutations Predict Recurrence-Free Survival and Recurrence Patterns in Colon Cancer: A Unicenter Study in Morocco.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConflicting results on the shift of right-left ratio in colon cancer incidence have been reported. We examine incidence trends by subsite in a population-based study. MATERIALS AND
methodsColorectal cancer cases diagnosed in the 1985-2005 period were identified through the Tuscany Cancer Registry. Colon subsite was defined as proximal and distal; gender, age at diagnosis, histology, and stage were analyzed. Average annual incidence and age-specific rates according to subsite were calculated.
resultsA total of 21,160 colorectal cancer cases were extracted; in 18,311 cases, the subsite was identified: 6,916 rectal, 5,239 proximal, and 6,156 distal. A larger proportion of distal colon cancers presented as early stage when compared with proximal. Incidence of rectal and distal colon cancer remained stable, while proximal colon cancer incidence increased.
conclusionsProximal colon cancer incidence rate increased through the period. Temporal variations in the incidence rate by subsite could suggest different carcinogenic pathways of right- and left-sided colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23478843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.