ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2013
Optimal selection of asymptomatic patients for carotid endarterectomy based on predicted 5-year survival.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.Stroke · 2022Pooled it
- The contemporary role for carotid revascularization in older patients.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2026Review
- Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.Journal of stroke · 2021Review
- Frailty as measured by the Risk Analysis Index is associated with long-term death after carotid endarterectomy.Journal of vascular surgery · 2020Article
- Long-term Durability and Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy Closure Techniques.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- The management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Is there a benefit to operate elderly patients?Translational medicine @ UniSa · 2020Article
- Trends and controversies in carotid artery stenosis treatment.F1000Research · 2020Review
- Risk Prediction Tools to Improve Patient Selection for Carotid Endarterectomy Among Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.JAMA surgery · 2019Article
- Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2019Article
- An Accumulated Deficits Model Predicts Perioperative and Long-term Adverse Events after Carotid Endarterectomy.Annals of vascular surgery · 2018Article
- The urgent need for contemporary clinical trials in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Neurology · 2016Review
- Relationships between 2-Year Survival, Costs, and Outcomes following Carotid Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative.Annals of vascular surgery · 2016Article
- Risk Factors for Incident Carotid Artery Revascularization among Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2016Article
- Development and pilot feasibility study of a health information technology tool to calculate mortality risk for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the Carotid Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients.Journal of vascular surgery · 2014Article
- Preoperative white matter lesions are independent predictors of long-term survival after internal carotid endarterectomy.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byDiscussion.2013
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed to prevent stroke, long-term survival is essential to ensure benefit, especially in asymptomatic patients. We examined factors associated with 5-year survival following CEA in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.
methodsProspectively collected data from 4114 isolated CEAs performed for asymptomatic stenosis across 24 centers in the Vascular Study Group of New England between 2003 and 2011 were used for this analysis. Late survival was determined with the Social Security Death Index. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for mortality within the first 5 years after CEA and to calculate a risk score for predicting 5-year survival.
resultsOverall 3- and 5-year survival after CEA in asymptomatic patients were 90% (95% CI 89%-91%) and 82% (95% CI 81%-84%), respectively. By multivariate analysis, increasing age, diabetes, smoking history, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 or dialysis dependence), absence of statin use, and worse contralateral ICA stenosis were all associated with worse survival. Patients classified as low (27%), medium (68%), and high risk (5%) based on number of risk factors had 5-year survival rates of 96%, 80%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001).
conclusionsMore than four out of five asymptomatic patients selected for CEA in the Vascular Study Group of New England achieved 5-year survival, demonstrating that, overall, surgeons in our region selected appropriate patients for carotid revascularization. However, there were patients selected for surgery with high risk profiles, and our models suggest that the highest risk patients (such as those with multiple major risk factors including age ≥ 80, insulin-dependent diabetes, dialysis dependence, and severe contralateral ICA stenosis) are unlikely to survive long enough to realize a benefit of prophylactic CEA for asymptomatic stenosis. Predicting survival is important for decision making in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.