Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23478502›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2013

Optimal selection of asymptomatic patients for carotid endarterectomy based on predicted 5-year survival.

Jessica B Wallaert, Jack L Cronenwett, Daniel J Bertges, Andres Schanzer, Brian W Nolan, Randall De Martino, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Philip P Goodney, Vascular Study Group of New England

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica B WallaertVA Outcomes Group, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03765, USA. jessica.wallaert@hitchcock.org
Jack L Cronenwett
Daniel J Bertges
Andres Schanzer
Brian W Nolan
Randall De Martino
Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen
Philip P Goodney
Vascular Study Group of New England

Funding

Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PADK08HL105676 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GOODNEY, PHILIP P · 2010 to 2014
$700k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL05676NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL105676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed to prevent stroke, long-term survival is essential to ensure benefit, especially in asymptomatic patients. We examined factors associated with 5-year survival following CEA in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

methodsProspectively collected data from 4114 isolated CEAs performed for asymptomatic stenosis across 24 centers in the Vascular Study Group of New England between 2003 and 2011 were used for this analysis. Late survival was determined with the Social Security Death Index. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for mortality within the first 5 years after CEA and to calculate a risk score for predicting 5-year survival.

resultsOverall 3- and 5-year survival after CEA in asymptomatic patients were 90% (95% CI 89%-91%) and 82% (95% CI 81%-84%), respectively. By multivariate analysis, increasing age, diabetes, smoking history, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 or dialysis dependence), absence of statin use, and worse contralateral ICA stenosis were all associated with worse survival. Patients classified as low (27%), medium (68%), and high risk (5%) based on number of risk factors had 5-year survival rates of 96%, 80%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001).

conclusionsMore than four out of five asymptomatic patients selected for CEA in the Vascular Study Group of New England achieved 5-year survival, demonstrating that, overall, surgeons in our region selected appropriate patients for carotid revascularization. However, there were patients selected for surgery with high risk profiles, and our models suggest that the highest risk patients (such as those with multiple major risk factors including age ≥ 80, insulin-dependent diabetes, dialysis dependence, and severe contralateral ICA stenosis) are unlikely to survive long enough to realize a benefit of prophylactic CEA for asymptomatic stenosis. Predicting survival is important for decision making in these patients.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesEndarterectomy, CarotidPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overAsymptomatic DiseasesCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23478502
PMCPMC3930459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.