Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23478137›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2013

Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.

Alberto Recio-Spinoso, Nigel P Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Interplay Between Spike-Time and Spike-Rate Modes in the Auditory Nerve Encodes Tone-In-Noise Threshold.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2013
    Article
  8. Mechanisms and mechanics of auditory masking.The Journal of physiology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alberto Recio-SpinosoInstituto de Investigación en Discapacidades Neurológicas (IDINE), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Almansa 14, 02006 Albacete, Spain. alberto.recio@uclm.es
Nigel P Cooper

Funding

COCHLEAR MECHANICSR01DC001910 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RHODE, WILLIAM S. · 1993 to 2007
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001910NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC01910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the search for cochlear correlates of auditory masking by noise stimuli, we recorded basilar membrane (BM) vibrations evoked by either tone or click signals in the presence of varying levels of background noise. The BM vibrations were recorded from basal regions in healthy cochleae of anaesthetized chinchilla and gerbil. Non-linear interactions that could underpin various aspects of psychophysical masking data, including both compression and suppression at the BM level, were observed. The suppression effects, whereby the amplitude of the responses to each stimulus component could be reduced, depended on the relative intensities of the noise and the tones or clicks. Only stimulus components whose frequencies fell inside the non-linear region of the recording site, i.e. around its characteristic frequency (CF), were affected by presentation of the 'suppressing' stimulus (which could be either the tone or the noise). Mutual suppression, the simultaneous reduction of the responses to both tones and noise components, was observed under some conditions, but overall reductions of BM vibration were rarely observed. Moderate- to high-intensity tones suppressed BM responses to low-intensity Gaussian stimuli, including both broadband and narrowband noise. Suppression effects were larger for spectral components of the noise response that were closer to the CF. In this regime, the tone and noise stimuli became the suppressor and probe signals, respectively. This study provides the first detailed observations of cochlear mechanical correlates of the masking effects of noise. Mechanical detection thresholds for tone signals, which were arbitrarily defined using three criteria, are shown to increase in almost direct proportion to the noise level for low and moderately high noise levels, in a manner that resembles the findings of numerous psychophysical observations.

Indexed as

SoundAcoustic StimulationAnimalsBasilar MembraneChinchillaGerbillinaePerceptual MaskingSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID23478137
PMCPMC3678051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.