Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23477556›Full record

ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2013

Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Hitchintan Kaur, Shihong Mao, Seema Shah, David H Gorski, Stephen A Krawetz, Bonnie F Sloane, Raymond R Mattingly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02121873 (The Breast Duct), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02121873 completednot on this map

The Breast Duct: Pilot Study of Genomic Sequencing of Exfoliated Ductal Cells Obtained Through Endoscopy and Lavage

TypeobservationalSponsorAtossa Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2011 to 2012Enrolled6ConditionsBreast Cancer, Preneoplastic Conditions, Ductal Carcinoma in SituArmsNipple aspirator, Ductal lavage microcatheter, Blood draw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: immune cell composition according to subtype.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  8. In Vitro Models for Studying Invasive Transitions of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2019
    Review
  9. Ras and Rap1: A tale of two GTPases.Seminars in cancer biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hitchintan KaurDepartment of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Shihong Mao
Seema Shah
David H Gorski
Stephen A Krawetz
Bonnie F Sloane
Raymond R Mattingly
Wayne State University · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Proteolytic Pathways in Progression of Pre-Malignant Breast DiseaseR01CA131990 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATTINGLY, RAYMOND R, SLOANE, BONNIE F · 2008 to 2013
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS P30 CA22453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammographic screening leads to frequent biopsies and concomitant overdiagnosis of breast cancer, particularly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Some DCIS lesions rapidly progress to invasive carcinoma, whereas others remain indolent. Because we cannot yet predict which lesions will not progress, all DCIS is regarded as malignant, and many women are overtreated. Thus, there is a pressing need for a panel of molecular markers in addition to the current clinical and pathological factors to provide prognostic information. Genomic technologies such as microarrays have made major contributions to defining subtypes of breast cancer. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) modalities offer unprecedented depth of expression analysis through revealing transcriptional boundaries, mutations, rare transcripts and alternative splice variants. NGS approaches are just beginning to be applied to DCIS. Here, the authors review the applications and challenges of NGS in discovering novel potential therapeutic targets and candidate biomarkers in the premalignant progression of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma in SituFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNABiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID23477556
PMCPMC3804339
OpenAlexW2156802125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.