Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23477477›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2013

The immigrant paradox among Asian American women: are disparities in the burden of depression and anxiety paradoxical or explicable?

Anna S Lau, William Tsai, Josephine Shih, Lisa L Liu, Wei-Chin Hwang, David T Takeuchi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of Depression among Migrants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna S LauDepartment of Psychology.
William Tsai
Josephine Shih
Lisa L Liu
Wei-Chin Hwang
David T Takeuchi

Funding

NLAAS II: Unraveling Differences for Clinical ServicesU01MH062209 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI ALEGRIA, MARGARITA · 2000 to 2008
$10.6M
NATIONAL LATINO AND ASIAN AMERICAN STUDYU01MH062207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TAKEUCHI, DAVID T · 2000 to 2004
$7.2M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH062207NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH062209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated potential explanations for advantaged mental health status among immigrant Asian American women compared to U.S.-born Asian American women.

methodIn a nationally representative sample of 1,030 women (185 U.S.-born, 368 early-life immigrants [arrived before 25 years of age], 477 late-life immigrants), we examined the hypothesis that increased exposure to social risk factors mediate nativity-based differences in lifetime prevalence of depression and anxiety disorders. Indicators of social class were also examined as protective factors enjoyed by U.S.-born women that may suppress observed nativity-based disparities. We also examined whether there were group differences in reactivity to stress in predicting disorder.

resultsU.S.-born women were twice as likely as late-life immigrants to report lifetime history of depression (odds ratio [OR] = 2.03, 95% CI [1.35, 4.54]) and anxiety (OR = 2.12, 95% CI [1.34, 5.19]). Nativity differences in perceived discrimination, family conflict, and cultural conflict explained disparities in rates of disorder. There was no support for the contention that immigrant women were more psychologically hardy or resilient to social stress.

conclusionFindings suggest that the gap in mental health status between U.S.- and foreign-born Asian American women would indeed be magnified if differences in social status were accounted for, but also that ready explanations for the so-called immigrant paradox are found in differential levels of reported stress exposure.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnxiety DisordersAsianCost of IllnessDepressive DisorderEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocial ClassStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23477477
PMCPMC3835700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.