Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23476811›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2013

Why I am not shy: a reply to Tononi and Cirelli.

Marcos Gabriel Frank

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Ontogenesis of Mammalian Sleep: Form and Function.Current sleep medicine reports · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sleep research goes wild: new methods and approaches to investigate the ecology, evolution and functions of sleep.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sleep and synaptic plasticity in the developing and adult brain.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2015
    Review
  12. Sleep, clocks, and synaptic plasticity.Trends in neurosciences · 2014
    Review
  13. Sleep memory processing: the sequential hypothesis.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marcos Gabriel Frank

Funding

REM mechanisms in neocortical developmentR01HL114161 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK, MARCOS G · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent article I reviewed an influential theory of sleep function, the "synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (SHY.)" According to SHY, sleep renormalizes synapses that are potentiated during prior wakefulness. I concluded that while SHY is a seminal theory with important implications about sleep function and the brain, its underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. In an accompanying article, the authors of SHY responded at length. Their reply is thoughtful and provocative, but unfortunately many of the points I raised were not accurately represented or addressed. In this brief commentary, I attempt to clarify some points of confusion. I also explain why any theory of sleep function is incomplete without an understanding of the underlying cellular mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeuronal PlasticitySleepSynapses

Identifiers

PMID23476811
PMCPMC3583075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.