Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23476784›Full record

ArticleJournal of drug delivery2013

Convection-enhanced delivery for targeted delivery of antiglioma agents: the translational experience.

Jonathan Yun, Robert J Rothrock, Peter Canoll, Jeffrey N Bruce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of drug delivery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Convection-Enhanced Delivery.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Ephs and Ephrins in malignant gliomas.Growth factors (Chur, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan YunGabriele Bartoli Brain Tumor Laboratory, Departments of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 1130 St. Nicholas Avenue Room 1001, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Robert J Rothrock
Peter Canoll
Jeffrey N Bruce

Funding

Targeting Kif11 to Treat Glioblastoma Invasion and ProliferationR01NS073610 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI CANOLL, PETER, ELMQUIST, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
CHRONIC CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) OF TOPOTECAN FOR GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA161404 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRUCE, JEFFREY N · 2012 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161404NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent improvements in the understanding of glioblastoma (GBM) have allowed for increased ability to develop specific, targeted therapies. In parallel, however, there is a need for effective methods of delivery to circumvent the therapeutic obstacles presented by the blood-brain barrier and systemic side effects. The ideal delivery system should allow for adequate targeting of the tumor while minimizing systemic exposure, applicability across a wide range of potential therapies, and have existing safe and efficacious systems that allow for widespread application. Though many alternatives to systemic delivery have been developed, this paper will focus on our experience with convection-enhanced delivery (CED) and our focus on translating this technology from pre-clinical studies to the treatment of human GBM.

Identifiers

PMID23476784
PMCPMC3586495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.