Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23475919›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2013

A beamforming study for implementation of vibro-acoustography with a 1.75-D array transducer.

Matthew W Urban, Carl Chalek, Bruno Haider, Kai E Thomenius, Mostafa Fatemi, Azra Alizad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00627614 (Identification and Differentiation of Breast Masses by Vibro-Acoustography), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00627614 nacompletednot on this map

Identification and Differentiation of Breast Masses by Vibro-Acoustography

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2006 to 2014Enrolled147ConditionsBreast CancerArmsbreast imaging study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew W UrbanDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. urban.matthew@mayo.edu
Carl Chalek
Bruno Haider
Kai E Thomenius
Mostafa Fatemi
Azra Alizad
General Electric (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Utility of serum and Tissue Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Androgen DeprivP50CA091956 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TINDALL, DONALD J. · 2001 to 2010
$23.4M
In Vivo Breast Imaging and Tissue Evaluation by Vibro-acoustic MethodsR01CA127235 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FATEMI, MOSTAFA · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
Breast vibroacoustography with array probeR21CA121579 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALIZAD, AZRA · 2007 to 2008
$631k
NCI NIH HHS CA091956NCI NIH HHS CA121579NCI NIH HHS CA127235NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091956NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127235NCI NIH HHS R21 CA121579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibro-acoustography (VA) is an ultrasound-based imaging modality that uses radiation force produced by two cofocused ultrasound beams separated by a small frequency difference, Δf, to vibrate tissue at Δf. An acoustic field is created by the object vibration and measured with a nearby hydrophone. This method has recently been implemented on a clinical ultrasound system using 1-D linear-array transducers. In this article, we discuss VA beamforming and image formation using a 1.75-D array transducer. A 1.75-D array transducer has several rows of elements in the elevation direction which can be controlled independently for focusing. The advantage of the 1.75-D array over a 1-D linear-array transducer is that multiple rows of elements can be used for improving elevation focus for imaging formation. Six configurations for subaperture design for the two ultrasound beams necessary for VA imaging were analyzed. The point-spread functions for these different configurations were evaluated using a numerical simulation model. Four of these configurations were then chosen for experimental evaluation with a needle hydrophone as well as for scanning two phantoms. Images were formed by scanning a urethane breast phantom and an ex vivo human prostate. VA imaging using a 1.75-D array transducer offers several advantages over scanning with a linear-array transducer, including improved image resolution and contrast resulting from better elevation focusing of the imaging point-spread function.

Indexed as

TransducersAlgorithmsComputer SimulationElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingProstateUltrasonography, Mammary

Identifiers

PMID23475919
PMCPMC3610531
OpenAlexW2089305214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.