Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23475541›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2013

Long-term tolerability and safety of lamotrigine extended-release: pooled analysis of three clinical trials.

Victor Biton, Bassel F Shneker, Dean Naritoku, Anne E Hammer, Alain Vuong, Paul T Caldwell, John A Messenheimer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor BitonArkansas Epilepsy Program, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. vbiton@gmail.com
Bassel F Shneker
Dean Naritoku
Anne E Hammer
Alain Vuong
Paul T Caldwell
John A Messenheimer
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USArkansas Cardiology · USGlaxoSmithKline (Netherlands) · NLThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn three randomized double-blind clinical trials, lamotrigine extended-release (lamotrigine XR) was demonstrated to be effective in the adjunctive treatment of intractable partial seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and as monotherapy for partial seizures.

objectiveA pooled analysis of the data from these three clinical trials was performed to determine whether the tolerability and safety profile of lamotrigine XR was similar to lamotrigine immediate-release (lamotrigine IR).

methodsThis report describes results of a pooled analysis of the tolerability and safety data from the double-blind and open-label phases of these three trials. The number of patients in the integrated database exposed to one or more doses of lamotrigine XR was 662.

resultsDuration of exposure to lamotrigine XR was ≥26 weeks in 82.5 % of patients and ≥52 weeks in 40.8 % of patients [mean (standard deviation) 39.8 (23.3) weeks]. The number of patients with one or more adverse events during double-blind or open-label treatment was 455 (69 %). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of suspected cause, were headache (25 % of patients) and dizziness (16 % of patients). The number of patients with one or more adverse events considered to be reasonably attributed to lamotrigine XR during double-blind or open-label treatment was 202 (31 %). The most common adverse events considered to be reasonably attributed to lamotrigine XR were dizziness (10 % of patients) and headache (6 % of patients). Lamotrigine-attributed rash was reported in 4 % of patients and was the reason for premature withdrawal in 2 %. Adverse events leading to premature withdrawal were reported in 7 % of patients. The incidence of serious lamotrigine-attributed adverse events was 1 %. One case of serious rash was reported. No cases of rash were reported to be Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Two deaths (acute cardiac failure and acute lamotrigine poisoning) were considered reasonably attributable to lamotrigine XR. No evidence of lamotrigine-attributed changes was observed in clinical laboratory data or vital signs.

conclusionThe results show that lamotrigine XR is well tolerated with safety and tolerability profiles similar to those of lamotrigine IR. Given the similar safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles of lamotrigine XR and lamotrigine IR, the extended-release formulation may be preferable for many patients because of its ease of use (with once-daily dosing regardless of concomitant antiepileptic drug), the potential for enhanced compliance with once-daily dosing, and the provision of more stable serum drug concentrations. The benefit of once-daily dosing must be balanced with the potentially greater negative impact of a missed dose.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleHumansLamotrigineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeizuresTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTriazinesAnticonvulsantsDelayed-Action PreparationsLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID23475541
OpenAlexW1981167952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.