Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23475188›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2013

Partners and post-translational modifications of nuclear lamins.

Dan N Simon, Katherine L Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cells · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Knockdown ofCell adhesion & migration · 2023
    Article
  14. Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan N SimonDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Katherine L Wilson
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF NUCLEAR ENVELOPE ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLYR01GM048646 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, KATHERINE L · 1994 to 2012
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048646PHS HHS R01 048646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear intermediate filament networks formed by A- and B-type lamins are major components of the nucleoskeleton that are required for nuclear structure and function, with many links to human physiology. Mutations in lamins cause diverse human diseases ('laminopathies'). At least 54 partners interact with human A-type lamins directly or indirectly. The less studied human lamins B1 and B2 have 23 and seven reported partners, respectively. These interactions are likely to be regulated at least in part by lamin post-translational modifications. This review summarizes the binding partners and post-translational modifications of human lamins and discusses their known or potential implications for lamin function.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusHumansLamin Type ALamin Type BMutationNuclear EnvelopeNuclear MatrixProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalLamin Type ALamin Type B

Identifiers

PMID23475188
PMCPMC3619935
OpenAlexW1969085991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.