Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23475138›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2013

Analysis of the fungal flora in environmental dust samples by PCR-SSCP method.

Tobias Janke, Karin Schwaiger, Markus Ege, Carmen Fahn, Erika von Mutius, Johann Bauer, Melanie Mayer

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobias JankeInstitute of Animal Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354, Freising, Germany. tobias.janke@wzw.tum.de
Karin Schwaiger
Markus Ege
Carmen Fahn
Erika von Mutius
Johann Bauer
Melanie Mayer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional microbiological techniques yield only limited information on the composition of fungal communities in dust. The aim of this study was to establish and optimize PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis for investigation of fungal diversity in rural dust samples. Three different DNA extraction protocols were tested on 38 fungal cultures. A total of six known universal fungal primer pairs were tested targeting the 18S rRNA gene, the 28S rRNA gene and the ITS region, respectively. Objective evaluation was performed with respect to the following parameters: efficiency to amplify all 38 strains; separation of seven species from different phylogenetic groups on the SSCP gel; additional bands in PCR-SSCP analysis; possibility to classify the amplified gene fragments to species level. Primer ITS1/ITS4 and PowerSoil™ DNA isolation showed the best performance in most cases and were chosen for further analysis. The detection limit of the developed system was 200 CFU/g dust. Moreover, the reproducibility of the system could be demonstrated, leading to average profile similarities of 94.94% [SD = 2.51] within gels, 93.03% [SD = 4.69] between different days and 87.66% [SD = 6.62] between different gels when testing shed and mattress dust samples. Sequencing allowed identification on species level, in detail: Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Cladosporium cladosporioides as well as the yeasts Candida cabralensis and Candida catenulata. This demonstrates the adaptability of the method. In this study, a standardized system for fungal community analysis was developed that provides reproducible results applicable for epidemiological purposes.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDustFungiMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDustRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.