Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23474866›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2013

Self- and proxy report for the assessment of pain in patients with and without cognitive impairment: experiences gained in a geriatric hospital.

A Lukas, T Niederecker, I Günther, B Mayer, T Nikolaus

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03941990 (Impact of 50% Nitrous Oxide Inhalation on Pain Induced by Lumbar Puncture in Emergency), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941990 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Impact of 50% Nitrous Oxide Inhalation on Pain Induced by Lumbar Puncture in Emergency: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2019 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsPain, AnxietyArmsFixed 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A LukasAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Competence Center of Geriatrics and Aging Research, Stipendiat Forschungskolleg Geriatrie, Robert Bosch Stiftung, University of Ulm, Akademisches Krankenhaus Universität Ulm, Zollernring 26-28, 89073, Ulm, Germany. albert.lukas@bethesda-ulm.de
T Niederecker
I Günther
B Mayer
T Nikolaus
Agaplesion Bethesda Klinik · DERobert Bosch Stiftung · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain assessment is a complex procedure in patients with different degrees of cognitive impairment. The challenge is to determine whether self-reporting tools are adequate and to identify the cases in which proxy ratings are necessary. PATIENTS AND

methodsAs part of an open, prospective observational study, 178 patients underwent a comprehensive pain assessment consisting of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Verbal Rating Scale with four and five items (VRS4 and VRS5) and the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD).

resultsEven without prior knowledge of a patient's cognitive impairment, this toolkit can be used to reliably identify cases where self-rating is appropriate and where proxy rating becomes necessary. Inter-rater reliability: "good" agreement [Cohen's κ = 74.2% (p < 0.001) (95%CI, 54.6-93.8%)], test-retest reliability: "moderate" agreement [κ = 55.3% (p < 0.001) (95%CI, 28.5-82.1%)]. Furthermore, movement resulted in a higher correlation between the selected assessments. Self-report assessments are appropriate up to a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) value greater than ten. In comparison to NRS, VRS4 and VRS5 remain more stable as the degree of cognitive impairment increases.

conclusionsIn the majority of the cases, our approach enables reliable appropriate pain assessment without the strict prerequisite of an upstream cognitive assessment.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersComorbidityFemaleGermanyHealth Services for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPrevalenceProxyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23474866
OpenAlexW1529789179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.