Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23474836›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2014

Treatment results of curative gastric resection from a specialist Australian unit: low volume with satisfactory outcomes.

Iain G Thomson, David C Gotley, Andrew P Barbour, Ian Martin, Neil Jayasuria, Janine Thomas, Bernard M Smithers

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iain G ThomsonUpper Gastrointestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, i.thomson@uq.edu.au.
David C Gotley
Andrew P Barbour
Ian Martin
Neil Jayasuria
Janine Thomas
Bernard M Smithers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing in Australia, yet it remains a common cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment. High-volume specialized units have reported superior perioperative and oncological outcomes. The role of D2 lymphadenectomy has been controversial as a result of concerns over increased morbidity. Our aim is to report the perioperative and oncological outcomes of curative gastric resection from a specialist Australian upper GI unit.

methodsData from a prospectively maintained database were reviewed for all patients undergoing curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma from a single unit during a 12-year period. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compiled.

resultsThere were 255 curative gastric resections during 12 years. An R0 resection was performed in 96 % with a perioperative mortality rate of 1.6 %. A D2 dissection was performed in 85 % of cases in the past 6 years, with no increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality detected. The 5-year overall survival was 53 %.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that both short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resection in gastric cancer patients, comparable to international high-volume centers, can be achieved in an Australian upper GI unit. A D2 lymph node dissection can be performed safely without any increase in perioperative risk in a specialist unit that has the necessary training but also the perioperative support structures to manage these complex patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.