ReviewBone marrow transplantation2013
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative sources for adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL: what should we choose when no HLA-matched related donor is available?
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of efficacies of haploidentical transplantation and matched sibling donor transplantation in treating T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Post-remission measurable residual disease directs treatment choice and improves outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in CR1.International journal of hematology · 2022Article
- T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma.Annals of transplantation · 2018Article
- Risk factors for outcomes after unrelated cord blood transplantation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report on behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2014Article
- Understanding basic steps to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation evaluation.American journal of blood research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The best outcome for patients with Ph chromosome-negative ALL (Ph(-) ALL) can be obtained by HLA-matched related donor (mRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first CR. However, only 30% of patients have a mRD. Three alternative sources, unrelated donor (URD), cord blood, and haploidentical related donor (haplo-RD), are available. URD allo-HCT is an old-established alternative source, and recent data have shown that URD allo-HCT can result in OS comparable with that with mRD allo-HCT for patients with Ph(-) ALL in first CR (OS at 4 years: mRD 65% vs URD 62%). Unrelated cord blood transplantation can also be indicated for patients with Ph(-) ALL in first CR (OS at 4 years: 57%), especially for young patients without an HLA-matched URD or patients who are in urgent need for allo-HCT. Limited data for haplo-RD allo-HCT for ALL showed utility in CR (OS at 3 years: up to 65%) but a survival rate of only 5-7% in non-CR. As there are no confirmed data about the utility of allo-HCT from an alternative source for adolescent and young adults who are eligible for pediatric protocols or for elderly patients with reduced-intensity conditioning. Further investigation, including investigation of minimal residual disease detection, may reveal subgroups of patients who can receive benefits from allo-HCT. Selection of the best source based on the patient status and appropriate timing is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23474804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.