Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23474467›Full record

ArticleNature methods2013

Quantitative estimation of activity and quality for collections of functional genetic elements.

Vivek K Mutalik, Joao C Guimaraes, Guillaume Cambray, Quynh-Anh Mai, Marc Juul Christoffersen, Lance Martin, Ayumi Yu, Colin Lam, Cesar Rodriguez, Gaymon Bennett and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 5'UTR sequences influence protein levels inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biosensor-based isolation of amino acid-producingMetabolic engineering communications · 2021
    Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vivek K MutalikBIOFAB International Open Facility Advancing Biotechnology, Emeryville, California, USA.
Joao C Guimaraes
Guillaume Cambray
Quynh-Anh Mai
Marc Juul Christoffersen
Lance Martin
Ayumi Yu
Colin Lam
Cesar Rodriguez
Gaymon Bennett
Jay D Keasling
Drew Endy
Adam P Arkin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practice of engineering biology now depends on the ad hoc reuse of genetic elements whose precise activities vary across changing contexts. Methods are lacking for researchers to affordably coordinate the quantification and analysis of part performance across varied environments, as needed to identify, evaluate and improve problematic part types. We developed an easy-to-use analysis of variance (ANOVA) framework for quantifying the performance of genetic elements. For proof of concept, we assembled and analyzed combinations of prokaryotic transcription and translation initiation elements in Escherichia coli. We determined how estimation of part activity relates to the number of unique element combinations tested, and we show how to estimate expected ensemble-wide part activity from just one or two measurements. We propose a new statistic, biomolecular part 'quality', for tracking quantitative variation in part performance across changing contexts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsBioengineeringEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene LibraryPeptide Chain Initiation, TranslationalPeptide Initiation FactorsProkaryotic Initiation FactorsTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsPeptide Initiation FactorsProkaryotic Initiation Factors

Identifiers

PMID23474467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.