Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23474135›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2013

Prior access to a sweet is more protective against cocaine self-administration in female rats than in male rats.

Angie M Cason, Patricia S Grigson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angie M CasonDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. casona@musc.edu
Patricia S Grigson
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Drugs of Abuse and Learned Aversions: Solving a ParadoxR37DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 2012 to 2020
$2.9M
DRUGS OF ABUSE AND LEARNED AVERSIONS: SOLVING A PARADOXR01DA009815 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 1996 to 2011
$2.3M
Drugs of Abuse, Gender Differences, and Protection by SweetsF32DA023354 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CASON, ANGIE · 2008 to 2010
$149k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA023354NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009815NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA009815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that female rats are more sensitive than male rats to the reinforcing effects of cocaine (Lynch, 2008 [42] for review). We hypothesized that greater preference for cocaine would support greater avoidance of a cocaine-paired taste cue in female vs. male rats. Moreover, at least in male rats, greater avoidance of the taste cue is associated with greater cocaine self-administration (Grigson and Twining, 2002 [3]). Thus, we anticipated that female rats would not only demonstrate greater avoidance of the drug-paired taste cue, but greater drug-taking as well. We tested these hypotheses by examining avoidance of a saccharin cue in male and female rats following several pairings with self-administered saline or cocaine (0.16, 0.33, or 0.66 mg/infusion). Contrary to expectations, the results showed that female rats exhibited less avoidance of the cocaine-associated saccharin cue than male rats and self-administered less, rather than more, cocaine, Thus, while female rats reportedly take more drug than male rats when the drug is presented in the absence of an alternative reward, they take less drug than male rats when the opportunity to self-administer cocaine is preceded by access to a palatable sweet. Females, then, may not simply be more sensitive to the rewarding properties of drug, but also to the reinforcing properties of natural rewards and this increase in sensitivity to sweets may serve to protect against drug-taking behavior.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement ScheduleSaccharinSelf AdministrationStatistics as TopicCocaineSaccharinSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID23474135
PMCPMC3665359
OpenAlexW2003863213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.