ReviewAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2013
Translational physiology and SND recordings in humans and rats: a glimpse of the recent past with an eye on the future.
Review in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recording sympathetic nerve activity in conscious humans and other mammals: guidelines and the road to standardization.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2017Review
- Deciphering the Neural Control of Sympathetic Nerve Activity: Status Report and Directions for Future Research.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) plays an important role in cardiovascular function, and based on the critical mechanistic relationship between altered sympathetic neural mechanisms and cardiovascular disease, it is important that the autonomic research community identifies deficiencies in the translational exchange of information and strives for a more thorough understanding of the translational significance of findings from studies involving sympathetic nerve discharge (SND) regulation in human and animal subjects. The present review assesses the state of the literature regarding studies that have used direct recordings of SND during the past three decades in humans and rats, focusing on; 1) identifying the number of studies reporting SND recordings in humans and rats, 2) briefly describing the translational exchange of SND regulation information from these studies, 3) contrasting the number of studies completed in anesthetized and conscious rats, and 4) assessing the prevalence of long-term SND recording studies in conscious rats. The majority of SND recordings in rats have been completed using anesthetized preparations, although a substantial number of studies have been completed in conscious rats. However, few studies have completed long-term (>5 days) SND recordings in freely-behaving rats, and even fewer studies have used experimental preparations that combine long-term nerve recordings with the capacity for completing central neural microinjections, or have been completed in animal models of cardiovascular disease. The wide-spread implementation of long-term SND recordings in rodent models of cardiovascular disease would be expected to enhance the translational exchange of clinically-relevant information between animals and humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.