Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472741›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Preclinical evaluation of the abuse potential of Pitolisant, a histamine H₃ receptor inverse agonist/antagonist compared with Modafinil.

M Uguen, D Perrin, S Belliard, X Ligneau, P M Beardsley, J M Lecomte, J C Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic challenges and burden of idiopathic hypersomnia: a systematic literature review.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Chemical Probes for Histamine Receptor Subtypes.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Therapeutic Potential of Histamine H3 Receptors in Substance Use Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The histamine HNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M UguenBioprojet-Biotech, Saint Grégoire Cedex, France.
D Perrin
S Belliard
X Ligneau
P M Beardsley
J M Lecomte
J C Schwartz
Bioprojet (France) · FRVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePitolisant, a histamine H₃ receptor inverse agonist/antagonist is currently under Phase III clinical trials for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness namely in narcoleptic patients. Its drug abuse potential was investigated using in vivo models in rodents and monkeys and compared with those of Modafinil, a psychostimulant currently used in the same indications. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of Pitolisant on dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, on spontaneous and cocaine-induced locomotion, locomotor sensitization were monitored. It was also tested in three standard drug abuse tests i.e. conditioned place preference in rats, self-administration in monkeys and cocaine discrimination in mice as well as in a physical dependence model. KEY

resultsPitolisant did not elicit any significant changes in dopaminergic indices in rat nucleus accumbens whereas Modafinil increased dopamine release. In rodents, Pitolisant was without any effect on locomotion and reduced the cocaine-induced hyperlocomotion. In addition, no locomotor sensitization and no conditioned hyperlocomotion were evidenced with this compound in rats whereas significant effects were elicited by Modafinil. Finally, Pitolisant was devoid of any significant effects in the three standard drug abuse tests (including self-administration in monkeys) and in the physical dependence model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: No potential drug abuse liability for Pitolisant was evidenced in various in vivo rodent and primate models, whereas the same does not seem so clear in the case of Modafinil.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalBenzhydryl CompoundsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug AntagonismDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Inverse AgonismDrugs, InvestigationalHistamine AgonistsHistamine AntagonistsMacaca mulattaMaleBenzhydryl CompoundsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineDrugs, InvestigationalHistamine AgonistsHistamine AntagonistsModafinilPiperidinespitolisantReceptors, Histamine H3Wakefulness-Promoting Agents

Identifiers

PMID23472741
PMCPMC3682710
OpenAlexW1562312771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.