Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472713›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants & redox signaling2013

Analysis of the bacterial response to Ru(CO)3Cl(Glycinate) (CORM-3) and the inactivated compound identifies the role played by the ruthenium compound and reveals sulfur-containing species as a major target of CORM-3 action.

Samantha McLean, Ronald Begg, Helen E Jesse, Brian E Mann, Guido Sanguinetti, Robert K Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Triple Crown: NO, CO, and HPharmacology & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Metals to combat antimicrobial resistance.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Metabolomics ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Potential of [Mn(CO)Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha McLean1 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, United Kingdom .
Ronald Begg
Helen E Jesse
Brian E Mann
Guido Sanguinetti
Robert K Poole

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H016805/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H01702X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCarbon monoxide (CO)-releasing molecules (CO-RMs) are being developed with the ultimate goal of safely utilizing the therapeutic potential of CO clinically. One such application is antimicrobial activity; therefore, we aimed to characterize and compare the effects of the CO-RM, CORM-3, and its inactivated counterpart, where all labile CO has been removed, at the transcriptomic and cellular level.

resultsWe found that both compounds are able to penetrate the cell, but the inactive form is not inhibitory to bacterial growth under conditions where CORM-3 is. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that the bacterial response to inactivated CORM-3 (iCORM-3) is much lower than to the active compound and that a wide range of processes appear to be affected by CORM-3 and to a lesser extent iCORM-3, including energy metabolism, membrane transport, motility, and the metabolism of many sulfur-containing species, including cysteine and methionine. INNOVATION: This work has demonstrated that both CORM-3 and its inactivated counterpart react with cellular functions to yield a complex response at the transcriptomic level. A full understanding of the actions of both compounds is vital to understand the toxic effects of CO-RMs.

conclusionThis work has furthered our understanding of how CORM-3 behaves at the cellular level and identifies the responses that occur when the host is exposed to the Ru compound as well as those that result from the released CO. This is a vital step in laying the groundwork for future development of optimized CO-RMs for eventual use in antimicrobial therapy.

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysOrganometallic CompoundsOxygen ConsumptionSulfhydryl CompoundsTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersEscherichia coli ProteinsOrganometallic CompoundsSulfhydryl CompoundsTranscription Factorstricarbonylchloro(glycinato)ruthenium(II)

Identifiers

PMID23472713
PMCPMC3869425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.