Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472635›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2013

A calcium-relay mechanism in vertebrate phototransduction.

Karl-Wilhelm Koch, Daniele Dell'orco

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Where vision begins.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Impaired CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl-Wilhelm KochDepartment of Neurosciences, Biochemistry Group, University of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Strasse 9-11, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany. karl.w.koch@uni-oldenburg.de
Daniele Dell'orco
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium-signaling in cells requires a fine-tuned system of calcium-transport proteins involving ion channels, exchangers, and ion-pumps but also calcium-sensor proteins and their targets. Thus, control of physiological responses very often depends on incremental changes of the cytoplasmic calcium concentration, which are sensed by calcium-binding proteins and are further transmitted to specific target proteins. This Review will focus on calcium-signaling in vertebrate photoreceptor cells, where recent physiological and biochemical data indicate that a subset of neuronal calcium sensor proteins named guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) operate in a calcium-relay system, namely, to make gradual responses to small changes in calcium. We will further integrate this mechanism in an existing computational model of phototransduction showing that it is consistent and compatible with the dynamics that are characteristic for the precise operation of the phototransduction pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium SignalingGuanylate Cyclase-Activating ProteinsHumansLight Signal TransductionPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateGuanylate Cyclase-Activating ProteinsGUCA1B protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23472635
PMCPMC3689192
OpenAlexW2057424241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.