Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472490›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2013

Management of diabetes in resource-poor settings.

Paul Grant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Compendium of Perspectives on Diabetes: A Challenge for Sustainable Health in the Modern Era.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diabetes-related tuberculosis in the Middle East: an urgent need for regional research.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul GrantRoyal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK. drpaul.grant@doctors.org.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is an emerging problem in the developing world. In sub-Saharan Africa, for example, the incidence and prevalence of the disease is unknown, diagnosis is often made on the basis of poor information and a loosely defined set of criteria, and access to oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin is patchy and expensive. The best system of management is currently unclear and this article explores lessons learnt, good practice and the applicability of the structured 'directly observed treatment, short course' (DOTS) approach (the current best care system for tuberculosis disease management in resource-poor settings) to the management of chronic diseases such as diabetes.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesDisease ManagementAfrica South of the SaharaDiabetes MellitusHumansPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID23472490
PMCPMC5873700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.