Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472243›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2013

The 2012 SAGE wait times program: Survey of Access to GastroEnterology in Canada.

Desmond Leddin, David Armstrong, Mark Borgaonkar, Ronald J Bridges, Carlo A Fallone, Jennifer J Telford, Ying Chen, Palma Colacino, Paul Sinclair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline on screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Colorectal cancer surveillance after index colonoscopy: guidance from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2013
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patients' Experiences and Priorities for Accessing Gastroenterology Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Desmond Leddin
David Armstrong
Mark Borgaonkar
Ronald J Bridges
Carlo A Fallone
Jennifer J Telford
Ying Chen
Palma Colacino
Paul Sinclair
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · CAMcMaster University · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriodically surveying wait times for specialist health services in Canada captures current data and enables comparisons with previous surveys to identify changes over time.

methodsDuring one week in April 2012, Canadian gastroenterologists were asked to complete a questionnaire (online or by fax) recording demographics, reason for referral, and dates of referral and specialist visits for at least 10 consecutive new patients (five consultations and five procedures) who had not been seen previously for the same indication. Wait times were determined for 18 indications and compared with those from similar surveys conducted in 2008 and 2005.

resultsData regarding adult patients were provided by 173 gastroenterologists for 1374 consultations, 540 procedures and 293 same-day consultations and procedures. Nationally, the median wait times were 92 days (95% CI 85 days to 100 days) from referral to consultation, 55 days (95% CI 50 days to 61 days) from consultation to procedure and 155 days (95% CI 142 days to 175 days) (total) from referral to procedure. Overall, wait times were longer in 2012 than in 2005 (P<0.05); the wait time to same-day consultation and procedure was shorter in 2012 than in 2008 (78 days versus 101 days; P<0.05), but continued to be longer than in 2005 (P<0.05). The total wait time remained longest for screening colonoscopy, increasing from 201 days in 2008 to 279 days in 2012 (P<0.05). DISCUSSION: Wait times for gastroenterology services continue to exceed recommended targets, remain unchanged since 2008 and exceed wait times reported in 2005.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAdultCanadaColonoscopyFemaleGastroenterologyHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMass ScreeningReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23472243
PMCPMC3731118
OpenAlexW2108451426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.