Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23472121›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Nanoscale examination of microdamage in sheep cortical bone using synchrotron radiation transmission x-ray microscopy.

Garry R Brock, Grace Kim, Anthony R Ingraffea, Joy C Andrews, Piero Pianetta, Marjolein C H van der Meulen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bone quality changes associated with aging and disease: a review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage.Connective tissue research · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Garry R BrockSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Grace Kim
Anthony R Ingraffea
Joy C Andrews
Piero Pianetta
Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Cornell University · USStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

Multi-keV x-ray microscopy facility for bio-imagingR01EB004321 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PIANETTA, PIERO A · 2005 to 2008
$2.4M
Role of Microstructure in Nanomechanical Behavior of Bone TissueR01AR053571 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DER MEULEN, MARJOLEIN C · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053571NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR053571NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004321NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB004321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdamage occurs in bone through repeated and excessive loading. Accumulation of microdamage weakens bone, leading to a loss of strength, stiffness and energy dissipation in the tissue. Imaging techniques used to examine microdamage have typically been limited to the microscale. In the current study microdamage was examined at the nanoscale using transmission x-ray microscopy with an x-ray negative stain, lead-uranyl acetate. Microdamage was generated in notched and unnotched beams of sheep cortical bone (2×2×20 mm), with monotonic and fatigue loading. Bulk sections were removed from beams and stained with lead-uranyl acetate to identify microdamage. Samples were sectioned to 50 microns and imaged using transmission x-ray microscopy producing projection images of microdamage with nanoscale resolution. Staining indicated microdamage occurred in both the tensile and compressive regions. A comparison between monotonic and fatigue loading indicated a statistically significant greater amount of stain present in fatigue loaded sections. Microdamage occurred in three forms: staining to existing bone structures, cross hatch damage and a single crack extending from the notch tip. Comparison to microcomputed tomography demonstrated differences in damage morphology and total damage between the microscale and nanoscale. This method has future applications for understanding the underlying mechanisms for microdamage formation as well as three-dimensional nanoscale examination of microdamage.

Indexed as

AnimalsCompressive StrengthFemurMicroscopySheepStress, MechanicalSynchrotronsTensile StrengthWeight-BearingX-Ray MicrotomographyX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID23472121
PMCPMC3589441
OpenAlexW2018442433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.