ArticleGenes & nutrition2013
Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition.
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data in Personalized Nutrition: Bridging Biomedical, Psycho-behavioral, and Food Environment Approaches for Population-wide Impact.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Public perceptions of biospecimen sampling and uncertainty in the context of personalised nutrition.PloS one · 2025Article
- Precision or Personalized Nutrition: A Bibliometric Analysis.Nutrients · 2024Article
- A health technology assessment of personalized nutrition interventions using the EUnetHTA HTA Core Model.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- Tackling Atherosclerosis via Selected Nutrition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Precision nutrition: Maintaining scientific integrity while realizing market potential.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary.Genes & nutrition · 2021Article
- Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome Part II: Potential Opportunities and Pathways to Commercialisation.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Personalised nutrition and health.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Review
- Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.Genes & nutrition · 2017Review
- Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review.PloS one · 2017Article
- "Are you a gastroenterologist or a philosopher?".The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Editorial.Genes & nutrition · 2013Article
- Values at stake: autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice.Genes & nutrition · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumers often have a positive attitude to the option of receiving personalized nutrition advice based upon genetic testing, since the prospect of enhancing or maintaining one's health can be perceived as empowering. Current direct-to-consumer services over the Internet, however, suffer from a questionable level of truthfulness and consumer protection, in addition to an imbalance between far-reaching promises and contrasting disclaimers. Psychological and behavioral studies indicate that consumer acceptance of a new technology is primarily explained by the end user's rational and emotional interpretation as well as moral beliefs. Results from such studies indicate that personalized nutrition must create true value for the consumer. Also, the freedom to choose is crucial for consumer acceptance. From an ethical point of view, consumer protection is crucial, and caution must be exercised when putting nutrigenomic-based tests and advice services on the market. Current Internet offerings appear to reveal a need to further guaranty legal certainty by ensuring privacy, consumer protection and safety. Personalized nutrition services are on the borderline between nutrition and medicine. Current regulation of this area is incomplete and undergoing development. This situation entails the necessity for carefully assessing and developing existing rules that safeguard fundamental rights and data protection while taking into account the sensitivity of data, the risks posed by each step in their processing, and sufficient guarantees for consumers against potential misuse.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.