Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471781›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

An improved method for the extraction and quantification of adult Echinococcus from wildlife definitive hosts.

Karen Gesy, Michael Pawlik, Luciene Kapronczai, Brent Wagner, Brett Elkin, Helen Schwantje, Emily Jenkins

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Detecting co-infections ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Unexpected diversity of the cestode Echinococcus multilocularis in wildlife in Canada.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen GesyUniversity of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5B4. kmg934@mail.usask.ca
Michael Pawlik
Luciene Kapronczai
Brent Wagner
Brett Elkin
Helen Schwantje
Emily Jenkins
University of Saskatchewan · CAGovernment of Northwest Territories · CAMinistry of Forests · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scraping and counting technique (SCT), with sensitivity values close to 100 %, has been the protocol recommended by global regulatory bodies for the extraction of Echinococcus cestodes from the intestines of wild carnivores. The proposed scraping, filtration and counting technique (SFCT) maintained the sensitivity (p = 0.801, α = 0.05) and increased the efficiency of sample processing. SCT had sensitivity and negative predictive value of 91 and 97 %, respectively, when compared to SFCT. The SFCT significantly decreased processing time (p = 0.0001, α = 0.05) for each sample. The SFCT took an average of 68.5 min less to quantify than SCT, as the SFCT samples consistently contained less debris. The SFCT is therefore appealing for general post-mortem surveillance, to determine if prevalence and intensity of infection are changing in an established region, or if these important parasitic zoonoses are newly established in a region or host species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildCanidaeCoyotesEchinococcosisEchinococcusEchinococcus multilocularisFoxesIntestinesParasitologyPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificityWolvesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23471781
OpenAlexW1975204145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.