Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471728›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2013

Are survivorship care plans responsive to African-American breast cancer survivors?: voices of survivors and advocates.

Kimlin Ashing-Giwa, Carolyn Tapp, Shirley Brown, Gingi Fulcher, June Smith, Eudora Mitchell, Rhonda H Santifer, Kommah McDowell, Virginia Martin, Betty Betts-Turner and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Development of a prostate cancer survivorship care toolkit for Black men with clinical and contextual tailoring.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Structural Racism, Lifestyle Behaviors, and Obesity-related Cancers among Black and Hispanic/Latino Adults in the United States: A Narrative Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Communicating Critical Information to Cancer Survivors: an Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans in Use in Diverse Healthcare Settings.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. An overview of the unique challenges facing African-American breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  14. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  15. Toward equitably high-quality cancer survivorship care.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Psychosocial concerns and needs of cancer survivors treated at a comprehensive cancer center and a community safety net hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  18. Post-treatment problems of African American breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  19. Follow-up Care Education and Information: Identifying Cancer Survivors in Need of More Guidance.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimlin Ashing-GiwaCCARE, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010-3000, USA. kashing@coh.org
Carolyn Tapp
Shirley Brown
Gingi Fulcher
June Smith
Eudora Mitchell
Rhonda H Santifer
Kommah McDowell
Virginia Martin
Betty Betts-Turner
Deborrah Carter
Monica Rosales
Paris Adkins Jackson
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAfrican-American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) suffer the greatest from cancer recurrence, morbidity, and mortality in part due to the lack of cancer follow-up care and surveillance. To improve survival and survivorship, the Institute of Medicine advises that cancer survivors be provided a survivorship care plan (SCP). The current study investigated AABCS' understanding of SCP and gathered preliminary feedback on infusing cultural and socioecological responsiveness.

methodsThe study embraced a community-based participatory research framework. Three facilitated, structured, consensus meetings were conducted with AABCS (N = 25) and advocates (N = 3) to provide information towards identifying the content domains of an SCP that are culturally responsive to AABCS.

resultsAABCS recommended inclusion of patient-centered information on the purpose and use of the SCP. They raised concerns that higher mortality in AABCS may be due to greater comorbidities and inadequate surveillance and follow-up care. Participants recommended that the SCP document all comorbidities and medications, regardless of relationship to cancer; referrals for cancer-related providers; and culturally informed health advisories.

conclusionStudy findings indicate that the available SCP template lacked adequate content on health history, comorbidity, health promotion, and functioning. These factors constitute the underlying clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral risks for poor disease outcomes that may be exacerbated in AABCS. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: SCPs are intended to educate and activate patients to join their oncology care team as informed partners. However, the emerging science and implementation of SCPs seem void of patient input. Our investigation suggests a practical approach for survivor engagement in the SCP discourse to increase their cultural responsiveness and patient-centeredness.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandPatient Care PlanningSurvivorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient AdvocacyPhysician-Patient RelationsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID23471728
OpenAlexW2066854797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.