ArticleJournal of fluorescence2013
Direct observation of fluorescently labeled single-stranded λDNA molecules in a micro-flow channel.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Manipulation and Single-Molecule Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A new direct single-molecule observation method for DNA synthesis reaction using fluorescent replication protein A.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed two labeling methods for the direct observation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), using a ssDNA binding protein and a ssDNA recognition peptide. The first approach involved protein fusion between the 70-kDa ssDNA-binding domain of replication protein A and enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (RPA-YFP). The second method used the ssDNA binding peptide of Escherichia coli RecA labeled with Atto488 (ssBP-488; Atto488-IRMKIGVMFGNPETTTGGNALKFY). The labeled ssλDNA molecules were visualized over time in micro-flow channels. We report substantially different dynamics between these two labeling methods. When ssλDNA molecules were labeled with RPA-YFP, terminally bound fusion proteins were sheared from the free ends of the ssλDNA molecules unless 25-mer oligonucleotides were annealed to the free ends. RPA-YFP-ssλDNA complexes were dissociated by the addition of 0.2 M NaCl, although complex reassembly was possible with injection of additional RPA-YFP. In contrast to the flexible dynamics of RPA-YFP-ssλDNA complexes, the ssBP-488-ssλDNA complexes behaved as rigid rods and were not dissociated even in 2 M NaCl.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23471630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.