ArticleJournal of fluorescence2013
Prism-based spectral imaging of four species of single-molecule fluorophores by using one excitation laser.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dispersive Image Scanning Microscope for Multi-color High-resolution Imaging.ACS photonics · 2026Article
- Multipair Förster Resonance Energy Transfer via Spectrally Resolved Single-Molecule Detection.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Multimodal single-molecule microscopy with continuously controlled spectral resolution.Biophysical reports · 2021Article
- Simultaneous Multicolor Single-Molecule Tracking with Single-Laser Excitation via Spectral Imaging.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prism-based imaging system for simultaneously detecting four species of single-molecule (SM) fluorophores was developed. As for the detection method, four spectrally distinct species of BigDye fluorophores were bound to 50-nm-diameter gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to form AuNP/BigDye complexes. Four species of complexes were randomly immobilized on different fused-silica slides. BigDyes were excited by an argon-ion-laser (excitation wavelengths: 488 and 514.5 nm) beam through total internal reflection on the slide surface. SM fluorescence emitted from a complex was spectrally dispersed through a prism to form an SM spot elongated in the spectral direction on a charge-coupled device. A scattered light spot generated by the AuNP of the same complex under 594-nm laser illumination was used as a wavelength reference, and the SM fluorescence spectrum was obtained from the pixel-intensity pattern of the elongated SM spot. Peak locations of fluorescence spectra of all the observed SM spots were obtained, and their histograms were distinctly separated according to species. SM spots can thus be classified as one of four species according to their peak locations. By statistically analyzing the histograms, the classification accuracy was estimated to be above 93.8 %. The number of pixels in the spectral direction required for classifying four species of SM fluorophores was estimated to be 10. As for the conventional system (which uses two excitation lasers), 15 pixels are required. Using BigDyes as the four fluorophores (which consist of donors linked to acceptors and can be excited by just an argon-ion laser) is the reason that such a small number of pixels was achieved. The developed system can thus detect 1.5 times more SM fluorophores per field of view; that is, its throughput is 1.5 times higher. The approach taken in this study, namely, using BigDye with a prism-type system, is effective for increasing the throughput of DNA microarray-chip analysis and SM real-time DNA sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23471629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.