Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471611›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Protease inhibitors and cardiac autonomic function in HIV-infected patients: a cross-sectional analysis from the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Trial.

Elsayed Z Soliman, Mollie P Roediger, Daniel A Duprez, Hernando Knobel, Richard Elion, James D Neaton, INSIGHT SMART Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis of HIV and heart rate variability in the era of antiretroviral therapy.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elsayed Z SolimanEpidemiological Cardiology Research Center (EPICARE), Division of Public Health Sciences Wake Forest School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Mollie P Roediger
Daniel A Duprez
Hernando Knobel
Richard Elion
James D Neaton
INSIGHT SMART Study Group
University of Minnesota · USHospital Del Mar · ESNorth Carolina Division of Public Health · USWhitman-Walker Health · US

Funding

International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT)U01AI068641 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 2006 to 2010
$120.1M
TERRY BEIRN COMMUNITY PROGRAMS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH ONU01AI042170 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 1997 to 2006
$23.2M
Medical Research Council MC_U122886352Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/16NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI042170NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare cardiac autonomic function as measured by heart rate variability for HIV-infected participants taking protease inhibitors (PIs) with those taking a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor without a PI (NNRTI-no PI) regimen.

designCross-sectional analysis.

settingMulticentre study.

participants2998 participants (average age 44 years, 28% females) enrolled in the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Heart rate and two heart rate variability measures (the SD of all filtered RR intervals over the length of the recording (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences in normal RR intervals (rMSSD)).

resultsAt study entry, 869 participants were taking a boosted PI (PI/r), 579 a non-boosted PI and 1550 an NNRTI-no PI. Median values (IQR) of heart rate, SDNN and rMSSD were: 68 (60-75) beats/min (bpm), 21 (13-33) ms, 22 (13-35) ms in the PI/r group, 68 (60-75) bpm, 21 (13-33) ms and 21 (14-33) ms in the non-boosted PI group and 69 (62-77) bpm, 20 (13-31) ms and 21(13-33) ms in the NNRTI-no PI group. After adjustment for baseline factors, for those given PI/r and non-boosted PI, heart rate was 2.2 and 2.8 bpm, respectively, lower than the NNRTI-no PI group (p<0.001 for both). On the other hand, compared with the NNRTI-no PI group, log SDNN and log rMSSD were significantly greater for those in the non-boosted PI (p values for baseline adjusted differences in log-transformed SDNN and rMSSD were 0.004 and 0.001) but not for those in the PI/r group at the 0.01 α-level.

conclusionsCompared to an NNRTI-no PI regimen, heart rate was lower for those taking a PI/r or non-boosted PI and heart rate variability was greater, reflecting better cardiac autonomic function, for those taking a non-boosted PI regimen but not PI/r.

Identifiers

PMID23471611
PMCPMC3612790
OpenAlexW2130103666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.