ArticleFrontiers in plant science2013
Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Questions and Consequences of Omics in Genetically Engineered Crop Regulation.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Wild and Cultivated Amaranth Species Seeds by 2-DE and ESI-MS/MS.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Proteomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Phenotypic Performance, Molecular Diversity, and Proteomics in Transgenic Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Investigation of Possible Changes Induced by RNA Silencing in Some Leaf Metabolites of Transgenic Sugar Beet Events.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Mature Transgenic Poplar Expressing the Transcription FactorFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Proteomic Advances in Cereal and Vegetable Crops.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparative proteome analyses of rhizomania resistant transgenic sugar beets based on RNA silencing mechanism.GM crops & food · 2021Article
- Morpho-Physiological and Proteomic Response of Bt-Cotton and Non-Bt Cotton to Drought Stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Plant breeding involving genetic engineering does not result in unacceptable unintended effects in rice relative to conventional cross-breeding.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020Article
- RoundupToxics · 2019Article
- Comparative Proteomics of Phytase-transgenic Maize Seeds Indicates Environmental Influence is More Important than that of Gene Insertion.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- iTRAQ-based quantitative tissue proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in non-transgenic and transgenic soybean seeds.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Proteomics Applications in Health: Biomarker and Drug Discovery and Food Industry.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2018Article
- Toxicological and Biochemical Analyses Demonstrate the Absence of Lethal or Sublethal Effects ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Proteomic analysis of phytase transgenic and non-transgenic maize seeds.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Comparative Proteomics of Leaves from Phytase-Transgenic Maize and Its Non-transgenic Isogenic Variety.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- A proteomic analysis of seeds from Bt-transgenic Brassica napus and hybrids with wild B. juncea.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Comparative proteomics of Bt-transgenic and non-transgenic cotton leaves.Proteome science · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hectares of genetically modified (GM) crops have increased exponentially since 1996, when such crops began to be commercialized. GM biotechnology, together with conventional breeding, has become the main approach to improving agronomic traits of crops. However, people are concerned about the safety of GM crops, especially GM-derived food and feed. Many efforts have been made to evaluate the unintended effects caused by the introduction of exogenous genes. "Omics" techniques have advantages over targeted analysis in evaluating such crops because of their use of high-throughput screening. Proteins are key players in gene function and are directly involved in metabolism and cellular development or have roles as toxins, antinutrients, or allergens, which are essential for human health. Thus, proteomics can be expected to become one of the most useful tools in safety assessment. This review assesses the potential of proteomics in evaluating various GM crops. We further describe the challenges in ensuring homogeneity and sensitivity in detection techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.