Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471430›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2013

Gadoxetate-enhanced versus diffusion-weighted MRI for fused Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/MRI in patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the upper abdomen.

Marius E Mayerhoefer, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Michael Weber, Markus Mitterhauser, Harald Eidherr, Wolfgang Wadsak, Markus Raderer, Siegfried Trattnig, Andreas Herneth, Georgios Karanikas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical PET/MR.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  3. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  4. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Diagnostic values ofEuropean radiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Whole-Body [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. ShouldWorld journal of surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marius E MayerhoeferDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. marius.mayerhoefer@meduniwien.ac.at
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Michael Weber
Markus Mitterhauser
Harald Eidherr
Wolfgang Wadsak
Markus Raderer
Siegfried Trattnig
Andreas Herneth
Georgios Karanikas
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare fused gadoxetate-enhanced Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/MRI and Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) for the assessment of abdominal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

methodsEighteen patients with suspected or histologically proven NETs of the abdomen were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/CT for a primary search, staging, or restaging, and received an additional MRI, including dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and DWI (b-values 50, 300 and 600). Co-registered gadoxetate-enhanced PET/MRI and PET/DWI were separately analysed for NET lesions by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist in consensus. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated on a per-region, per-organ and per-patient basis.

resultsEighty-seven out of 684 anatomical regions, and 23 out of 270 organs, were NET-positive in 14 out of 18 patients. Region-based sensitivities and specificities were 97.7 % and 99.7 % for gadoxetate-enhanced PET/MRI and 98.9 % and 99.7 % for PET/DWI. Organ-based sensitivities and specificities were 91.3 % and 99.6 % for gadoxetate-enhanced PET/MRI and 95.7 % and 99.6 % for PET/DWI. Finally, patient-based sensitivities and specificities were 100 % and 100 % for gadoxetate-enhanced PET/MRI and 100 % and 75 % for PET/DWI. Sensitivities and specificities of the two methods did not differ significantly.

conclusionsGadoxetate-enhanced Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/MRI and Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/DWI are equally useful for the assessment of abdominal NETs. KEY POINTS: • Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can both assess neuroendocrine tumours. • Fusion of PET/MR imaging provides helpful information. • Gadoxetate-enhanced Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/MRI and Ga-68-DOTANOC PET/DWI assess neuroendocrine tumours equally well. • PET/DWI is inherently simpler than gadoxetate-enhanced PET/MRI. • Only benign hepatic lesions pose a potential diagnostic dilemma for PET/DWI.

Indexed as

Gadolinium DTPAOrganometallic CompoundsAbdomenAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGallium RadioisotopesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle Aged68Ga-DOTANOCContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGallium RadioisotopesOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID23471430
OpenAlexW2000607640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.