Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471303›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2013

Understanding the pneumococcus: transmission and evolution.

Eric S Donkor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Expanded profiling ofBiological chemistry · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The microbiome of the nasopharynx.Journal of medical microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Nasopharyngeal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantInfectious disease reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. The Best of All Worlds:Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric S DonkorDepartment of Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School Accra, Ghana. ericsdon@hotmail.com; eric.sampane-donkor@Ishtm.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae is part of the normal bacterial flora of the narsopharynx, but is also associated with several invasive and non-invasive diseases. Recently, there has been a plethora of research information on the pneumococcus, however, there are few comprehensive review papers discussing the research information. This paper provides a review of the pneumococcus in two vital areas related to its biology including transmission and evolution. Transmission of the pneumococcus is a highly efficient process that usually occurs through respiratory droplets from asymptomatic carriers. Following acquisition, the pneumococcus may only establish in the nasopharynx of the new host, or further progress to sites such as the lungs and cause disease. Pneumococcus transmission risk factors, as well as factors involved in its translocation from the nasophyarnx to diseases sites are still not fully understood. Pneumococcal evolution is dominated by recombination. The recombinational events usually involve genetic exchange with streptococci of the mitis group and some pneumococci are thought to exhibit hyper-recombination.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionRecombination, GeneticCarrier StateHumansNasopharynxPneumococcal InfectionsRisk FactorsStreptococcus pneumoniaecarriageevolutionpneumococcusrecombinationtransmission

Identifiers

PMID23471303
PMCPMC3590460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.