Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23471071›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2013

Scientific considerations in the review and approval of generic enoxaparin in the United States.

Sau Lee, Andre Raw, Lawrence Yu, Robert Lionberger, Naiqi Ya, Daniela Verthelyi, Amy Rosenberg, Steve Kozlowski, Keith Webber, Janet Woodcock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04402762 (Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Ovine Enoxaparin to Porcine Enoxaparin), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04402762 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Ovine Enoxaparin to Porcine Enoxaparin (Lovenox®) in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsEnoxaparinArmsOvine Enoxaparin, Enoxaparin Prefilled Syringe [Lovenox]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Immunostimulatory Potential of Branded and US-Generic Enoxaparins in an In Vitro Human Immune System Model.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2015
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Untoward immune effects of modern medication.Journal of biomedical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Pharmacokinetic Profile of 3 Batches of Ovine Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and 1 Batch of Branded Enoxaparin.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sau LeeOffice of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Andre Raw
Lawrence Yu
Robert Lionberger
Naiqi Ya
Daniela Verthelyi
Amy Rosenberg
Steve Kozlowski
Keith Webber
Janet Woodcock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a generic low-molecular-weight heparin without clinical safety or efficacy data under the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) pathway. To enable a determination of active ingredient sameness of generic and innovator enoxaparin products, the FDA developed a scientifically rigorous approach based on five criteria: first, equivalence of physicochemical properties; second, equivalence of heparin source material and mode of depolymerization; third, equivalence in disaccharide building blocks, fragment mapping and sequence of oligosaccharide species; fourth, equivalence in biological and biochemical assays; and finally, equivalence of in vivo pharmacodynamic profile. In addition to fulfillment of these criteria, FDA also used in vitro, ex vivo and model animal data to ensure there was no increased immunogenicity risk of the generic enoxaparin product relative to the brand name product. The approval of the highly complex enoxaparin product using this framework under the ANDA pathway represents a major development. It also suggests that analytical and scientific advancements may in certain cases allow the elimination of unnecessary in vivo testing in animals and humans.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalCarbohydrate SequenceDrugs, GenericEnoxaparinMolecular Sequence DataOligosaccharidesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDrugs, GenericEnoxaparinOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID23471071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.