Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23470962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2013

Novel powdered anti-adhesion material: preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in a rat model.

Katsunori Takagi, Masato Araki, Hidetoshi Fukuoka, Hiroaki Takeshita, Shigekazu Hidaka, Atsushi Nanashima, Terumitsu Sawai, Takeshi Nagayasu, Suong-Hyu Hyon, Naoki Nakajima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-adhesive effects of a newly developed two-layered gelatin sheet in dogs.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katsunori TakagiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. spzq9r39@woody.ocn.ne.jp
Masato Araki
Hidetoshi Fukuoka
Hiroaki Takeshita
Shigekazu Hidaka
Atsushi Nanashima
Terumitsu Sawai
Takeshi Nagayasu
Suong-Hyu Hyon
Naoki Nakajima
Nagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough laparoscopic surgery has decreased postoperative adhesions, complications induced by adhesions are still of great concern. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-adhesive effects of a novel powdered anti-adhesion material that can be applied during laparoscopic surgery in comparison with other anti-adhesion materials.

methodsOur novel powdered anti-adhesion material is composed of aldehyde dextran and ε-poly(L-lysine). In 40 male rats, a 2.5×2.0-cm abdominal wall resection and cecum abrasion were performed. The rats were randomized into four groups based on the anti-adhesion treatments: normal saline; Seprafilm(®); Interceed(®); and novel powdered anti-adhesion material. The animals were euthanized on days 7 and 28 to evaluate the adhesion severity, area of adhesion formation, gross appearance, and pathological changes.

resultsThe adhesion severities on both days 7 and 28 were significantly lower for all anti-adhesion material groups compared with the normal saline group (p<0.05). Pathologically, all groups showed inflammatory cell infiltration on day 7 and complete regeneration of the peritoneum on day 28.

conclusionsOur novel powdered anti-adhesion material was found to be effective for reducing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions and showed equivalent efficacy to commercial anti-adhesion materials.

Indexed as

Postoperative CareAbdomenAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCecumHumansMalePeritoneumPowdersRatsTissue AdhesionsBiocompatible MaterialsPowdersadhesion preventionanti-adhesion materialsbiodegradable materialpowderrat model.

Identifiers

PMID23470962
PMCPMC3590608
OpenAlexW2169604394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.