Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23470494›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2013

New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jonas Oldgren, Lars Wallentin, John H Alexander, Stefan James, Birgitta Jönelid, Gabriel Steg, Johan Sundström

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03392948 (PERcutaneouS Coronary intErventions in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulant Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03392948 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

PERcutaneouS Coronary intErventions in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorItalian Society of Invasive CardiologyRan2018 to 2023Enrolled1,080ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, Chronic Stable Angina
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  20. Long-term residual cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome: antithrombotic treatment options.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022
    Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonas OldgrenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. jonas.oldgren@ucr.uu.se
Lars Wallentin
John H Alexander
Stefan James
Birgitta Jönelid
Gabriel Steg
Johan Sundström
Uppsala University · SEDuke Medical Center · USSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral anticoagulation in addition to antiplatelet treatment after an acute coronary syndrome might reduce ischaemic events but increase bleeding risk. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding direct thrombin or factor-Xa inhibition by any of the novel oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, darexaban, rivaroxaban, and ximelagatran) to single (aspirin) or dual (aspirin and clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy in this setting. METHODS AND

resultsAll seven published randomized, placebo-controlled phase II and III studies of novel oral anticoagulants in acute coronary syndromes were included. The database consisted of 30 866 patients, 4135 (13.4%) on single, and 26 731 (86.6%) on dual antiplatelet therapy, with a non-ST- or ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome within the last 7-14 days. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and clinically significant bleeding as the composite of major and non-major bleeding requiring medical attention according to the study definitions. When compared with aspirin alone the combination of an oral anticoagulant and aspirin reduced the incidence of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval 0.70; 0.59-0.84], but increased clinically significant bleeding (HR: 1.79; 1.54-2.09). Compared with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, adding an oral anticoagulant decreased the incidence of MACE modestly (HR: 0.87; 0.80-0.95), but more than doubled the bleeding (HR: 2.34; 2.06-2.66). Heterogeneity between studies was low, and results were similar when restricting the analysis to phase III studies.

conclusionIn patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, the addition of a new oral anticoagulant to antiplatelet therapy results in a modest reduction in cardiovascular events but a substantial increase in bleeding, most pronounced when new oral anticoagulants are combined with dual antiplatelet therapy.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdministration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDrug CombinationsFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsDrug CombinationsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAcute coronary syndromeAntiplatelet therapyMeta-analysisMyocardial infarctionOral anticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID23470494
PMCPMC3675388
OpenAlexW2029400346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.