Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23470320›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2013

Population genetic tools for dissecting innate immunity in humans.

Lluís Quintana-Murci, Andrew G Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in theInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lluís Quintana-MurciInstitut Pasteur, Unit of Human Evolutionary Genetics, Paris, France. quintana@pasteur.fr
Andrew G Clark

Funding

Functional /Comparative Genomic of Drosophila immunityR01AI064950 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2005 to 2016
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immunity involves direct interactions between the host and microorganisms, both pathogenic and symbiotic, so natural selection is expected to strongly influence genes involved in these processes. Population genetics investigates the impact of past natural selection events on the genome of present-day human populations, and it complements immunological as well as clinical and epidemiological genetic studies. Recent data show that the impact of selection on the different families of innate immune receptors and their downstream signalling molecules varies considerably. This Review discusses these findings and highlights how they help to delineate the relative functional importance of innate immune pathways, which can range from being essential to being redundant.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanHumansImmunity, InnateModels, GeneticModels, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID23470320
PMCPMC4015519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.