Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23470244›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2013

Views of Black nurses toward genetic research and testing.

Yolanda M Powell-Young, Ida J Spruill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Focus on You: Cancer clinical trials perspectives.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-ethnic minority nurses' knowledge and practice of genetics and genomics.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yolanda M Powell-YoungThe University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. ypyoung@dillard.edu
Ida J Spruill

Funding

Training CoreP20MD004817 · NIMHD · DILLARD UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, WARREN ALLEN · 2010 to 2014
$6.3M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD004817NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD00481701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe views and beliefs that Black nurses hold regarding several conceptual areas of genetic research and testing.

designData were generated using a descriptive, cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 384 Black nurses attending the 2009 annual conference of the National Black Nurses Association in Las Vegas, Nevada.

methodsThe chi-squared test was used to evaluate group differences by education level, functional area, age, and gender.

findingsOne half of the Black nurses surveyed believed the potential for the discriminative misuse of genetic information against minority populations exists. However, 84% of these nurses believed the possibility of information misuse should not be used as a barrier to participation in genetic research and testing by the Black populace.

conclusionsBlack nurses expressed concerns about the potential for discriminatory use of genetic information gleaned from research and testing. Yet, Black nurses recognize the importance of racial-ethnic minority participation in genetic research and testing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Participation in genetic research and testing by diverse populations will provide opportunities to improve the healthcare delivery system and aid the eradication of health disparities. More research is needed to clarify factors that contribute to the bifurcation of importance for participation, reluctance to participate, and what interventions might reduce reluctance.

Indexed as

Genetic ResearchGenetic TestingAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesSocial DiscriminationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23470244
PMCPMC3982602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.