Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23470005›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2013

The smart targeting of nanoparticles.

Adam D Friedman, Sarah E Claypool, Rihe Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Targeted gene delivery systems for T-cell engineering.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam D FriedmanEshelman School of Pharmacy and Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7568, USA. rihe_liu@unc.edu.
Sarah E Claypool
Rihe Liu

Funding

"Smart" Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy and ImagingU54CA119343 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAN DYKE, TERRY A · 2005 to 2009
$18.3M
Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DESIMONE, JOSEPH M. · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Novel Single Domain Antibodies with Multivalency and MultispecificityR01CA157738 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, RIHE · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA119343NCI NIH HHS CA151652NCI NIH HHS CA157738NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157738NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119343NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One major challenge in nanomedicine is the selective delivery of nanoparticles to diseased tissues. Nanoparticle delivery systems require targeting for specific delivery to pathogenic sites when enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) is not suitable or inefficient. Nanoparticle functionalization is a widely-used technique for targeting ligand conjugation; these ligands possess inherent abilities to direct nanoparticle selective binding. This review illustrates methods of ligand-nanoparticle functionalization, provides a cross-section of various ligand classes, including small molecules, peptides, antibodies, engineered proteins, or nucleic acid aptamers, and discusses some unconventional approaches currently under investigation.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticlesAnimalsDrug DesignHumansLigandsNanomedicinePharmaceutical PreparationsTissue DistributionLigandsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23470005
PMCPMC4016770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.