ArticlePloS one2013
Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
171 citing papers in PubMed, 601 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering high-fidelity bone organoids: Operational classification, multilineage crosstalk, biofabrication evidence, and translational validation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Dynamic flow-driven in vitro skin model reveals mechanosensitive remodeling pathways.Human cell · 2026Article
- Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Review
- Laser-Based Fabrication of Hydrogel Scaffolds for Medicine: From Principles to Clinical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transformative bioprinting: 4D printing and its role in the evolution of engineering and personalized medicine.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Photochemical corneal cross-linking: Evaluating the potential of a hand-held biopen.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinted Cancer Models: Opportunities for Personalized Medicine and Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2025Review
- Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2025Review
- 3D-Bioprinted Skin Tissues for Improving Wound Healing: Current Status and Perspective.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- 3D-printed biopolymer-based microneedle for enhanced photodynamic therapy in melanoma treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Organoids in skin wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Micro- and nano-fibers for organ-on-a-chip: Construction, applications, and prospects.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Breathing new life into tissue engineering: exploring cutting-edge vascularization strategies for skin substitutes.Angiogenesis · 2024Review
- A Futuristic Development in 3D Printing Technique Using Nanomaterials with a Step Toward 4D Printing.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Light-based 3D bioprinting technology applied to repair and regeneration of different tissues: A rational proposal for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Biofabrication Strategies for Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Sculpting the future: A narrative review of 3D printing in plastic surgery and prosthetic devices.Health science reports · 2024Article
111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering plays an important role in the production of skin equivalents for the therapy of chronic and especially burn wounds. Actually, there exists no (cellularized) skin equivalent which might be able to satisfactorily mimic native skin. Here, we utilized a laser-assisted bioprinting (LaBP) technique to create a fully cellularized skin substitute. The unique feature of LaBP is the possibility to position different cell types in an exact three-dimensional (3D) spatial pattern. For the creation of the skin substitutes, we positioned fibroblasts and keratinocytes on top of a stabilizing matrix (Matriderm®). These skin constructs were subsequently tested in vivo, employing the dorsal skin fold chamber in nude mice. The transplants were placed into full-thickness skin wounds and were fully connected to the surrounding tissue when explanted after 11 days. The printed keratinocytes formed a multi-layered epidermis with beginning differentiation and stratum corneum. Proliferation of the keratinocytes was mainly detected in the suprabasal layers. In vitro controls, which were cultivated at the air-liquid-interface, also exhibited proliferative cells, but they were rather located in the whole epidermis. E-cadherin as a hint for adherens junctions and therefore tissue formation could be found in the epidermis in vivo as well as in vitro. In both conditions, the printed fibroblasts partly stayed on top of the underlying Matriderm® where they produced collagen, while part of them migrated into the Matriderm®. In the mice, some blood vessels could be found to grow from the wound bed and the wound edges in direction of the printed cells. In conclusion, we could show the successful 3D printing of a cell construct via LaBP and the subsequent tissue formation in vivo. These findings represent the prerequisite for the creation of a complex tissue like skin, consisting of different cell types in an intricate 3D pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.